Del Bigtree the bully doesn’t get informed consent

It came to my attention Sunday night that Del Bigtree decided to harass James Horne – the ex husband of anti vaxxer Rebecca Bredow who was sent to prison for seven days for contempt of court. Bigtree challenged James at Los Angeles airport for being there and not in Detroit with his son, and tried to expose him as a neglectful father. James ignored all Bigtree’s questions, and quite rightly as well. It’s none of your bloody business, Bigtree! James could well have been in LA on business and his son may have been in the care of family. That’s not neglect! All Bigtree was doing was to try and make the mother look like an angel when she’d already fallen foul of the system by disobeying a court order to vaccinate her son! An order – no doubt – that Bigtree didn’t like. Well screw you! Come to Australia and harass me, Bigtree! You’ll get more than you bargain for and I don’t mean physically either! I’ll out gaff you – with the truth while I make you look like the bully and inciter of child neglect you are!

It also came to my attention through the crackpot Adventures in Autism blog that Bigtree had written a letter to the acting Secretary of Health and Human Services in America, Eric Hargan (filling in while a replacement is found for Tom Price), claiming that Health and Human Services wasn’t fulfilling the requirements of vaccine safety. In this 19 page letter several questions were put. In this blog entry I intend to respond to those questions as appropriately as I can.

(1) Please explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?

There’s no need for it. Testing over a long period of time has already been done and the differences in time are too small to be relevant. Provide proof that this testing is not adequate in full detail, and include in this verifiable proof of adverse reactions specifically to the Hepatitis vaccine. Anecdotes are not acceptable.

(2) Please list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life?

That is commercially confidential and none of your business.

(3) Please explain why HHS failed to cooperate with Harvard to automate VAERS reporting? And detail any steps that HHS has taken since toward automating VAERS reporting?

VAERS is broken because it is easily accessed by the general public and unverified information has been inserted. Automating the system will only exacerbate that issue.

(4) Please explain any specific steps taken by HHS to improve adverse reaction reporting to VAERS?

None. See the answer to question four for the explanation.

(5) For each of the 38 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 1994 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

There were none, because the subjects of the adverse events – and/or their parents – were not co-operative with the process.

(6) For each of the 135 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 2011 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

Again, there were none, because the subjects of the adverse events – and/or their parents – were not co-operative with the process.

(7) Please explain what HHS has done to assure that health care providers record the manufacturer and lot number for each vaccine they administer?

Nothing because that is additional bureaucratic mumbo jumbo that is not required.

(8) Please advise when HHS intends to begin conducting research to identify which children are susceptible to serious vaccine injury? If HHS believes it has commenced this research, please detail its activities regarding same?

We already know which children can not be vaccinated and it is up to the family physician to ensure this is taken into account.

(9) Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?

That claim should not be removed – because it’s true. There are 121 studies to prove it.

(10) Please advise whether HHS intends to forthwith conduct adequately powered and controlled prospective as well as retrospective studies comparing total health outcomes of fully/partially vaccinated children with completely unvaccinated children?

This is impossible so it will not be done. It is not as simple as you make it out to be.

(11) Please advise if you will:
a. prohibit conflict waivers for members of HHS’s vaccine committees (ACIP, VRBPAC, NVAC & ACCV)?
b. prohibit HHS vaccine committee members or HHS employees with duties involving vaccines from accepting any compensation from a vaccine maker for five years?
c. require that vaccine safety advocates comprise half of HHS’s vaccine committees?
d. allocate toward vaccine safety an amount at least equal to 50% of HHS’s budget for promoting/purchasing vaccines?
e. support the creation of a vaccine safety department independent of HHS?
f. support the repeal of the 1986 Act to the extent it grants immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their vaccine products?

a. There is no need for this.
b. The only way this can be done is to stop vaccine makers from payings taxes. That is not going to happen.
c. The sort of people that are being advocated will compromise the health of community through over protection from medicine leading to the return of preventable disease.
d. This will require higher taxes to pay for such a scheme.
e. There is no need for this either.
f. This defeats the purpose of the 1986 Act in that pharmaceutical companies contribute to the pool of money used for payouts. Such a limited repeal would be contradictory.

Having said that on the last one, I support the repeal of the whole thing lock stock and barrel. It’s a joke because it pays out of probability instead of the propoer rules of evidence in law. Or alternatively remove the protections of doctors and others who administer the vaccines – as I firmly believe that the vast majority of injuries are caused by system error (as was the case with Hannah Poling).

There’s your informed consent, Bigtree. Get it?

I know the answer. No, he doesn’t. We already have informed consent and he doesn’t want to know about it. He’s part of the Andrew Wakefield con job and it’s time it was stopped once and for all. With that in mind after I checked – guess what, Del?

Advertisement

Final expose of Mary Kristi Rowe

I noted today that Rowe has bailed on the comments areas on You Tube. Doesn’t matter – I already had all the screenshots, and I also have her details as well meaning that she’ll be in the top list of the AV Name Check on the next update. And yes there were more forcing this third entry. I thought as much. Mary Kristi Rowe is a coward. She won’t comment on here, preferring to make excuses and target someone else just because they linked her to here.

The instant someone invokes that history book and twists it, you know you’re dealing with a fool. One can’t reason with an unreasonable person, and Rowe is unreasonable. I know the form. It’s typical anti vax. So “speaking the truth in love” is impossible. You have to fight fire with fire. There is also so much wrong with this let’s break it down beyond her shifting the goal posts to another person instead of addressing me here.

1. The Momma she speaks of is Polly Tommey. She has no heart of gold. Her heart is jet black! Tommey has no compassion or concern – except for her deluded agenda to prove that vaccines cause Autism to the detriment of an entire community! Tommey is about as sincere as KKK devotee embracing Michelle Obama!

2. Regarding Rowe’s beliefs – they are deluded. Aside from the fact that there is no “God” (and if there was that non existent diety would be furious with you, Rowe!), you are bearing false witness to yourself. And you won’t even accept that you’re doing it! You aren’t vaccine injured. Neither is your daughter. You’re both Autistic and have been since birth. I can’t speak for anyone else of course, but that sort of denial earns no compassion. If you want compassion, disown your deluded and dangerous views. Until you do, you don’t deserve compassion.

3. Let’s talk about the dancing. Of course you were working the kids too hard. Because you had no empathy (typically Autistic) for them. You wanted them to be you. And here is the coincidence – the way you were working your Autistic body caught up with you at the same moment you got the MMR jab. THAT is why you had to stop. You didn’t adjust to your Autistic body and you paid for it. Had nothing whatsoever to do with the MMR. NOTHING! But you don’t want to be identified as Autistic do you? So you sink to this excuse to escape it. Not once did Rowe mention Autism to prove that.

4. What you don’t have the right to do is lie, especially about vaccines and about Autism. You DO have a problem with the coincidence accusation, otherwise you wouldn’t carry on like this. You DO want everyone to believe you. Thousands of lies don’t validate yours. They just show how poorly educated you and everyone else is. And that brings us to “getting all the info” argument. You have too much and you can’t separate the reliable from the unreliable. And you’re believing the unreliable because it fits your preferred version of events. The vaccination programs are fine when they are used as intended, and that includes pre screening which is another lie on your part. That IS done – or it should be. Only quacks don’t. The safety level already exists.

As was pointed out to her, claiming a vaccine injury is the same as saying vaccines don’t work. Lying about the vaccine injury only has one effect – undermining vaccine efficacy. You might have believed they worked, Rowe, but you don’t now! Otherwise you would continue to vaccinate! Ergo – you DON’T believe they work! You have plenty of motivation for lying. It’s called denial of reality. You don’t want to know like all anti vaxxers. You have your own little world. You want your message out there when it’s a lie so you can gain respect. The same sort of respect Hitler engaged in before he wiped out the Jews. You want to wipe out Autism, because that’s what your claims to vaccine injury will lead to if you aren’t gagged! You want freedom of speech? Hate speech doesn’t count!! And you DID read this blog! Stat Counter showed you did! You want to talk? Comment here! I don’t have an account on You Tube.

That first sentence is a contradiction, unless she is talking about a sore arm – which we know she isn’t. There are no PROVEN adverse events like what she has claimed. Only anecdotes, which are valueless in medicine unless they have back up! All those other examples do not match those of vaccines. Nowhere near it. The benefit v risk ratio for vaccines are way over towards the benefits. The risk is 1 in a million, and that is only because of human error through using the vaccine incorrectly. Take the human factor out, and vaccines are 100 percent safe.

I saw no logic, reason or honesty. So civility is useless. It’s you who needs to do some soul searching and it starts with acknowledging that you are not vaccine injured. You are Autistic. Your standard is low.

And I’ll say it again. I’m not on You Tube. Want to talk to me? COMMENT HERE!!

More rubbish from Mary Kristi Rowe

I collected some of these screenshots myself this morning upon noticing that there was more than I’d been sent (and one was clipped by accident), and this woman is a liar! The person she was arguing with was owning her rear end.

This lot started with this from Rowe;

You’re not vaccine injured. You haven’t proven it. I remain convinced that you found out you were Autistic, and blamed it on the vaccine when you were Autistic from birth. Like it or not. Take note here that she admits to being anti vaccine, and see what happens below.

First off, the comparison to cigarette smoking is ridiculous – because unlike vaccination, smoking is risky to the max!

Second, there was PLENTY to base the comment that she is a liar on! There is no lab work. If there was there would be medical back up and a court case claiming the damage. Remember that her doctor wouldn’t take her claims seriously, because he knew she was wrong! When liars like this run their mouths they have to expect to be insulted, especially when it comes to one of the most important medical practices in the history of man – vaccination.

This rant has so many lies in it it’s unreal – starting with what is obviously a belief in that idiot Robert F Kennedy Junior’s stupid line that mercury is mercury and that ethyl mercury doesn’t exist in effect (or methyl mercury come to that). Along with weight adjusted nonsense that I’ve already hung Twistan Wells for. It doesn’t work like that and besides the amount of ethyl mercury per vaccine was 12.5 micrograms. 12 and a half parts to a million! The claim that her daughter had mercury in her body to such high levels means the reading was taken from the unreliable hair test – or she lied again. Another lie – doctors ARE educated on vaccines. Her claim that her nephew is a doctor is therefore also a lie, or he is a specialist in a field that doesn’t deal with vaccines (general example – an osteopath, a doctor in America but nowhere else including Australia! Sherri Tenpenny is one of those.). It’s obvious that Rowe is reading unreliable sources. Not one piece of legit research. That’s why you won’t get through. There is no conflict of interest between the pharmaceutical companies and the medical community, because vaccines make no profit. All the profits come from pain killers and the medical community is actually striking back trying to get said pain killers better controlled. At least that’s what’s happening in Australia! That lunch claim is total bunk! Known side effects? A sore arm? Whoopee do.

Now I do agree that babies shouldn’t be vaccinated when they are ill and running a temperature. But that’s on the instructions and some you actually can. A doctor who ignores those instructions is a quack who should be reported. The doctor is guilty of vaccine injury, not the vaccine. That’s why I hate the Vaccine Court. Doctors who do that get off scot free when they shouldn’t. They wouldn’t in Australia – except that idiotic parents blame the vaccine! That’s a key reason why an investigation is essential!

That was when I was brought in and she was told about “the list” – meaning of course the AV Name Check.

More lies about doctors lunches. Except the point about the government paying – and that’s needed certainly in the US because they have to be in attendance. If you don’t provide perks they’ll go where the money is and those who don’t have money will die – per the Tea Party saying “Let them die”. That was disgusting then and it is now, and it’s NOT a spot to cut health spending! Doing that will make the US health system an even bigger joke than it is now! Her claim that she has been careful is nonsense. She has found sites that she wants to believe instead of ones that are actually peer reviewed and correct. That one site she noted is 100 percent unreliable! If you want assistance, Rowe, it starts with stopping blaming the vaccines for your and your daughter’s issues! As long as you do, you won’t get help. You won’t be believed because it has been confirmed that vaccines are safe when used correctly.

My previous entry was then linked and look at this whine!

First of all, I love Stat Counter. Because it confirmed I was right. Rowe does live in Gadsden, Alabama (nearby Eastaboga showed up). Nothing here is false or malicious. Come at me with that accusation in court! I have won three court cases already and I can throw you right out of whack because I can prove with evidence that you are lying. You have no proof of your claims. Now note here that she says she is NOT an anti vaxxer and yet earlier as noted further up she said that she IS!! As she was rightly told, ex vaxxer and anti vaxxer are the same thing. She now wants us to believe that because she vaccinated means she can’t be an anti vaxxer. Yes you can! Your lies about vaccines on the public domain is anti vax behaviour and that’s a public interest matter by the way. Also, it’s clear that she doesn’t understand herd immunity. Her railing against vaccines fits the bill of inciting child neglect per the AV Name Check.

More excuses to not come here and comment. Get some guts, Rowe. If you have a problem with what I wrote – comment here! Don’t sulk away on that You Tube video comments area. That makes you a coward, and actually that makes sense. All anti vaxxers are cowards. I have twisted nothing here. I’ve called you out for what you are – an anti vaxxer and a inciter of child neglect. So…..

Mary Kristi Rowe is deluded

It was brought to my attention on the comments of a You Tube video by my good friend and fellow Autistic Fiona O’Leary that we have another candidate for the AV Name Check. I had a look and it looks like this one is a candidate.

A quick skim of a web search revealed that it looks like she lives in Gadsden, Alabama in the US. She must be in the anti vaccine loop because she knew about John Piesse here in Victoria so it makes sense that she’s a typical American anti vaxxer loaded with conspiracy theories and also making claims without medical proof. That goes back to my “Once and for all – Prove it” entry again. Here’s the link again.

https://allaboutantivaxxers.wordpress.com/2017/01/27/once-and-for-all-prove-it/

Let’s review some of these comments.

First off Tommey isn’t a doctor, and she is a liar and manipulator. It’s not without foundation that she was kicked out of Australia. She doesn’t have a vaccine injured son. She has an Autistic son. Two totally different things. What you witnessed was taken into account by the doctor and ignored because you were wrong. Everyone asked were telling the same story because they refused to believe the truth out of paranoia and stupidity. And it’s interesting that Rowe admits that Vaxxed is about the MMR vaccine when the promotional material disowns any connection to vaccines. That one she told the truth about and it proves that it IS an anti vaccine film! Owned! What scares us is the lies being told being believed leading to less vaccinations and more preventable disease and more childhood deaths!

Tommey should be in jail. She is lying witch. The Court of Federal Claims (the Vaccine Court) is a joke because it doesn’t follow the rules of evidence that a court should, so it pays out too easily. If it did the payouts would be a whole lot less, if not zero! 50 percent and a feather is not a high standard of proof! The fee does exist and that was part of the agreement met in 1986, and frankly it should be taken down not because it protects Big Pharma but because it protects negligent doctors and nurses who make the mistakes with vaccines that do injure. Vaccines themselves have NEVER injured anyone. Any injury is caused by the system. The inserts – and this was mentioned in reply on the comments – are legal statements and have no medical value. VAERS is an unreliable repository that is loaded with false claims because anyone can report an incident and not need to medically prove it. The only people playing Russian Roulette are those who won’t vaccinate. The Supreme Court never made any ruling on vaccines themselves and this was expanded on;

Researched where? Google? Get out of here, Rowe! Google Uni is closed to people like you because you only read what you want to read! She put the noose around Justice Scalia in particular, but Scalia NEVER said the words “unavoidably unsafe”.

Oh what a liar! Again – the words “unavoidably unsafe” were never used in any opinion, not just Scalia’s! Rowe never read it, or rather she never understood it. Now while the claim itself was about involving vaccine design and that wasn’t covered by the Vaccine Court so pharma could be sued for it, it was also ruled that all vaccine related matters go to the vaccine court. So that in fact allows for the Vaccine Court to make recommendations, leading to better design. But given the poor standard for proof in the Vaccine Court Big Pharma doesn’t have to listen. There was NO discussion on the term “unavoidably unsafe”. The risk of injury lies in usage and not the vaccine itself. When the system is working properly, vaccination is safe. Any side effects are minor. Risks were never considered by the US Supreme Court.

Rowe called out on the first paragraph and I’ll repeat it. A design-defect claim does not mean unavoidably unsafe. I’ll clarify that by saying that the claim needs to be proven first, and also that unavoidably unsafe does not correlate with that as a defect can be corrected. Therefore the lack of safety (supposed) is removed and is therefore not unavoidable!

The second paragraph suggests that Rowe is making the same claim as Tommey (and Ginger Taylor). That vaccine injury equals Autism. The main suggestion is that it “runs in the family”. Autism would run in a family – it’s genetic. Getting the chicken pox does NOT confer lifelong immunity (my sister in law got it twice!) and any childhood disease has the potential to kill! I repeat the reference re the measles that I have made before – Olivia Dahl. I got the measles and it was far from pleasant. My sister did too. She got the Chicken Pox and the Mumps (I avoided both somehow). I remember the Mumps being really nasty. If those conditions didn’t scare you then you are an idiot! Confirm the Autism is your family so I know what I’m dealing with.

This is another reference to Google. You don’t know more because what you “know” is wrong. You haven’t proven you are a member of the “vaccine injury club”.

We all know a liar when we see one, Rowe, and you are a liar. You don’t know yourself or your daughter and that’s dangerous to both of you. I’m a paralegal – which is as close as one can get to being a lawyer without doing the study and getting the qualifications – and I can tell you that you didn’t understand what you read in that Supreme Court decision. Your medical experience (based on your own words) is faked because you wouldn’t listen to your doctor in the first place as stated further up. The minute you do that, your experience means nothing.

These screenshots were sent to me and I am told there was one more that was deleted, but the content was retained in an automatic email. I won’t reproduce it, but Rowe claimed to have a “Jurist Doctorate”. I looked it up and it’s actually a Juris Doctorate, and in the United States this does not require scholarly content. It is required in Australia and other western countries (how dumb is the US huh?). Either way, Rowe has never been before a judge presenting a case. I have.

This is going to take two entries so I’ll leave this here and finish it tomorrow, including maybe an update as I expect this entry to be linked to Rowe. If she wants to react to it – do that here and not on You Tube as I do not have an account there. Using others as informants for this is not appropriate in this case.