Jamie McIntyre needs re-educating

What is in the water in northern New South Wales? It can’t be everywhere because the McCaffreys live up there and they are smart, as is my namesake up there in Jessica Gluyas – unlike this goof who lives in a place called Moggs Swamp! It’s 30 kilometres south west of Glen Innes.

Jamie McIntyre published a rubbish book titled “The Great Vaccine Con”, and in the product description it says “This book pulls no punches and shares why many have a hard time accepting the lie of vaccines. Well researched and easy to read. This book will make many Pro Vaxxers change their position instantly. It’s hard to argue against the Vaccine Con after reading this book. Perhaps a game changer.” I doubt it is well researched, certainly scientifically – and there is a very good example of poor research later in this blog entry. A game changer? The book appears to be available only as an e-book, and it’s the first I’ve heard of it when it was first available in 2017.

McIntyre was part of the Melbourne Cup field that contested the New England by election in 2017, and he did the worst getting only 222 votes. It wasn’t the first time as he ran in 2013 and did a lot better with 6,059 in fourth place. He was also banned from holding a corporate directorship for 10 years for property spruiking in 2016 as a result of a Federal Court consent order, with the ABC labelling him a “controversial spruiker”. As this entry shows, the term “controversial” is putting it mildly to say the least!

McIntyre showed up on the Facebook page of the fake news site Australian National Review – a site he launched himself by the way – on an entry asking a lot of ridiculous vaccine related questions. One reply was from Richard Kowalczyk who claimed he’d done his research and would not get himself vaccinated. I rounded on him, telling him to redo his research because he got it wrong. McIntyre barged in with this;

I responded to that through the All About Anti Vaxxers page calling him a child neglector for that crack (and I stand by that as do the other AAAV admins). McIntyre shot back with this garbage;

I told him in reply that vaccines make no profit, and they don’t. I’ll add here that the bullies are the anti vaxxers. Bullies lie all the time. I’m not touching that reference to Hitler. My retort caused the following rant that had more holes than Swiss cheese.

I didn’t get at this one myself – FT (another admin of AAAV) got in first making the point that expenditure cancels revenue out. He identified the rest as “alternative medicine propaganda” and told him that he should not attend any hospital no matter what. I’ll add that he lied when he said there was no regulatory oversight. What’s the Therapeutic Goods Administration, idiot? The bloody regulator who does the testing! If it was a con there would be vaccine injuries everywhere – and there aren’t! It’ll be idiots like McIntyre who will be in jail if I have a say in it for inciting child abuse/neglect! And how can Big Pharma buy the government when it’s government money that makes childhood vaccines free? That payout amount is based on probability only and not proven injury. His assertion that there will be massive issues in five to ten years is bunk, because the issue (according to anti vaxxers) is already there. Autism. Bull.

McIntyre had this for FT;

It was Chrissie McKewen who came in at this point, followed by Barbara Vernon and Carl Davis. Chrissie called McIntyre dangerous and not vaccines, and added that pharma profits from pills (and mis-identified McIntyre as female calling him a witch). Barb demanded sources for his claims, while Carl identified him as a lost cause coming from the “Cult of Meryl” as I indicated in the opening remark of this article. For myself, all the marketing is done for pills! Where do we see advertising for vaccines? Nowhere! That profit margin is for the pills as Chrissie pointed out. Vaccines ARE tested as I said above and ARE needed!

McIntyre responded to all that thus;

The admin of the page Autism is not caused by vaccines was in first pointing to a note on that page titled “There are studies” (the very same one I shot at Lort Bizniz by direct link on the last entry). The link couldn’t be put there as the ANR page spams out links it doesn’t like. Barb suggested McIntyre use Google (not advice I would give) while making the point that government testing is commercially confidential. McIntyre totally ignored AINCBV and addressed Barb only;

He then added a link to another Australian National Review article (which wasn’t spammed out of course). I used the AAAV page to point out that Chrissie had linked 166 studies on her page and told McIntyre he owed her a million dollars. In addition here, the insert on vaccines is not medically viable as it is a legal statement only that should be removed as it admits to unproven things being linked to vaccines. McIntyre promptly moved the goal posts on the payout thus;

Chrissie promptly called him a welcher, telling him the studies she had listed were indeed independent. She threatened to send debt collectors after him (I have no idea how she could do that). It was at that point that I pronounced McIntyre as being added to the AV Name Check for lying about vaccines – as well as welching on Chrissie. He never said that Chrissie had to match the million until then. That wasn’t the original deal and deep down he knew it and bailed to a safe haven. My news had McIntyre reacting this way;

As I had hit him with the Chris Jericho meme I wasn’t responding to him there. I posted under AAAV on this occasion because I felt like it. His attack on my intelligence level was bullying at it’s most scintillating. He followed up with this;

This is delusional. Big Pharma isn’t worried at all, because they know the truth as do the truly intelligent in this world – people like myself. Those who are afraid of being exposed are the anti vaxxers as they are the ones looking at a jail term – again as I have said if I have any say in it.

This is beyond delusional. Let’s take this all down piece by piece.

1. A vaccine for stupidity would be applied to people like anti vaxxers. There is one. It’s called an education. But it doesn’t always work, as this idiot is admirable proof of.
2. A proper education does actually need to be tested and it costs as well so there would be no profit any more than any actual vaccine. But also like vaccines if it’s not used correctly there are issues.
3. The assertion that “saying that Autism is genetic is confusing” is insulting to say the least. Anyone with an education will know that it’s genetic!
4. Boosters are only needed because bodies change and grow so it’s needed to cover that factor. Education also needs a boost.
5. The scaremongerer here is McIntyre. He is dealing in fear that is irrational as this blurb clearly proves.
6. I can’t be bought.

This story is rubbish to say the least. For a start, crib death was common going back centuries! Mortality rates for many different reasons were through the roof for crying out loud! What a blatant fabrication! No good funeral director would make such statements! Flu deaths in the elderly are not caused by vaccines, but by a lack of herd immunity. The giveaway lie was that the assertion that this funeral director’s father had never seen a polio, measles or chicken pox death. Death from polio in particular was rife!! McIntyre made this up – or it was made up by someone else and he copied it. This is the example of poor research I was talking about at the beginning of this entry.

Additionally, there are NOT millions of parents speaking out! That’s a blatant exaggeration! Any “professional” who is speaking out is not a professional. Not at all. Any so called professional who is lying about vaccines is to be avoided at all costs.

Consequent to this I was banned from the Australian National Review page so I didn’t get the chance to bunk this at the time.

It’s McIntyre encouraging Russian Roulette using the next generation. Disease is a threat. Vaccines are not – unless they are used incorrectly and that is not the vaccine’s fault. McIntyre should stay in Moggs Swamp where he belongs because he is a poisonous individual who should be isolated for the good of the community in Glen Innes.

Advertisement

What sort of name is Lort Bizniz?

Another entry delayed by legal moronics.

Facebook have to do a better check of fake accounts. The name here is a pretty blatant fake name. It makes no sense, even in Croatian, which is where this dummy claims to live!This one showed up on the Del Bigtree review at the same time as Blakley in the previous entry, but unlike her I can’t do a background report. No surprise in that – like I said Lort Bizniz is not a real name.

Bizniz started with name calling calling me Philmore and uttered this rot;

Delfim Moutinho got him stating rightly that such a study would be unethical, and all Bizniz could say was;

Delfim identified people as decent humans, and disowned members of the “AV death cult” as part of that group. He backed that by pointing out that anti vaxxers like to expose everyone to serious disease and there are thousands of safety studies. Bizniz went the following route;

The proof Bizniz wants is commercially confidential, and it’s up to idiots like this to prove they haven’t been done and report same. The reference to The View was totally irrelevant, and Delfim hadn’t even heard of it! He also said the double blind placebo would be as unethical as Joseph Mengele’s disgusting work. Bizniz answered with a leading question;

Delfim threw the curve back, going back to the double blind placebo study and calling Bizniz out for moving the goal posts. Bizniz’s rejoinder?

We’re not losing the battle! If we were vaccines would be banned! It was Bizniz making excuses and delivering insults and Delfim rightly wanted to know where the insults were! Bizniz tried this in reply;

What a hypocrite! Vax-quacks is an insult without a doubt, and then Bizniz tried again;

Delfim used that to confirm Bizniz was a fan of Mengele and unethical studies, and Bizniz repeated the comment the idiot made again in reply. Delfim pointed out the obvious choice – either Bizniz didn’t know what a double blind placebo study was or he was looking for the ethics of a Nazi researcher (Mengele), and if it was the first Bizniz was simply an idiot. Bizniz reacted like a child accordingly;

Delfim in reply demanded to know which option fitted and Bizniz ran from it;

Delfim again repeated the demand, and this time Bizniz was more detailed;

Deflection? Delfim knew it wasn’t and confirmed by himself that Bizniz didn’t what the study was that was being asked for and called him an idiot. Bizniz didn’t like that and repeated his comment again. We then had Fiona Trullman come in and point out what I said that vax-quack is an insult before adding a GIF image about moving goal posts.

That was when I came in and pointed out that the double blind placebo study was impossible due to the infinite number of variables involved, and that was why it was unethical. Such a study has no scientific value. I then answered his question about the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, answering that it was passed in 1986 and detailed it’s purpose and how it was funding by taxation on vaccines and it’s method of payouts including probability. I linked to the article on the Facebook page Autism is not caused by vaccines for back up.

Bizniz firstly referred to Delfim’s last remark;

He then went to me;

He then childishly threw off Fiona;

I told him off for demanding I try again, pointing out that the link had all the information needed to prove the Vaccine Court was a joke. I also told him that I answered his query. Charlie Morris added that anti vaxxers didn’t know how to use Google Scholar. Bizniz shot back at Charlie;

That’s mortality rates, not prevalence rates! Typical anti vaxxer! I pointed out that I gave proof and demanded that he open his eyes or admit that he didn’t know his stuff. Bizniz’s response?

Charlie was the one with the meme, not me! This was goal post moving again, and lying as I called the study the idiot wanted unethical, not providing proof! I pointed out that I was talking about the Vaccine Court and gave the instruction to stay on topic. At first, Bizniz was confused;

But then realisation hit;

I told Bizniz in reply that the placebo study was impossible again, and to stop demanding it. I then erred talking about the wrong link on the Autism is not caused by Vaccines page, before repeating that I was telling the truth about the Vaccine Court and Bizniz was too scared to learn and needed help. I added that the Vaccine Court also protected reckless doctors who used vaccines wrong and for that reason needed to be shut down. I could not believe this reply;

In reply I admitted my error over Autism, before pointing out that doctors ARE trained in vaccines and that the stuff he was talking about wasn’t included as it was irrelevant. I pointed out that the BS in the Vaccine Court was the payout process (probability only instead of proof), and Bizniz continued the idiotics;

He totally ignored what I said and I told the fool off for not paying attention and read it again, and the reply?

He didn’t read it because I addressed the nonsense, and I had to repeat myself in more detail stating that what was wanted was NOT training vaccines. Training incorporated administration of injections of any sort including vaccines. Bizniz responded with this tripe;

In reply I told him to prove that his list was essential to vaccine usage. I already knew the right answer – it’s not. The car comparison was goal post movement, and I’ll add now that drivers of cars don’t need to be mechanics in order to drive a car. Doctors and nurses don’t need the material Bizniz wants them to learn for the same reason. They don’t need it. Bizniz’s reply beggared belief;

It’s the credibility of Bizniz that is under question here – what with a fake name for a start. I said that such studies were impossible, and I added that the experts in vaccines were immunologists and doctors and nurses relied on them. I told Bizniz to support vaccines because there was nothing to contraindicate it’s use. Bizniz though persisted like a brat;

I agreed that the issue won’t go away, and that was because Bizniz was (and is) an idiot and avoiding the point by in effect putting the fingers in the ears and going “lalalalala”. And Bizniz persisted in exactly that with this;

Total ignorance. Repeat – I spoke of medical doctors administering vaccines and understanding them from that perspective. Bizniz wants doctors to be immunologists on top of that! That’s what he wanted proof of – that doctors are immunologists etc and if they aren’t they shouldn’t have anything to do with vaccines. It’s BS! I don’t need to prove anything. As usual, it’s Bizniz and idiots like IT – I say it because I don’t know if this twit is male or female, and that this fool is a monster like all anti vaxxers who thrive on fear on not understanding and not wanting to understand – who need to give on proof. Proof that vaccines are dangerous. They have nothing and I put this meme there at the time and I’ll repeat it now, especially as I am updating the AV Name Check at the same time as this entry.