Is the AVrN lying?

In December the anti vax cranks at the Australian Vaccination-Risks Network advised that they had sent a letter to Brendan Murphy, demanding that the Therapeutic Goods Administration withdraw all approvals of all COVID-19 vaccines forthwith. They threatened to take them to the Federal Court if there was no compliance with the demand by Christmas Eve.

The vaccines remain approved – as they should be.

And now the proven liars are claiming that the case is due to start next week.

A search of the Federal Court registry at reveals a different result. No such case exists. A search in the applicant part gives no relevant results for any search term that would bring it up. With the simple restriction of “Vaccination” (as in the full name of the AVN) and the Federal Court of Australia – nothing comes up. Everything comes up. There is no way to hide it. And yet nothing comes up. It’s the same with “AVN” and “Dorey”.

One of my inner circle, who is no longer on Facebook, challenged the AVrN in the comments on their website under the name of this blog. It was trashed because it didn’t enter the moderation queue. That indicates that they have an auto trash for AAAV. Of course. So I make the same challenge my friend did – provide the file number. Until you do, there is no case.

This isn’t new. Dorey previously claimed that Polly Tommey had her three year ban reversed. Same thing – there was nothing anywhere in the Federal Court registry. It was subsequently found that there was no case – at all. Tommey never reversed the ban – she never even made an application (that would have shown up as well and it didn’t).

So in answer to the question in the title of this blog entry the answer at present is simple.


As they always do.

Note – prior to noting that nothing has been filed that I could find, I did send a letter to the Federal Minister for Health making a number of recommendations in order to nip this in the bud. It looks like being a waste of time.

Edit (13/1) – corrected the name of the person claimed to have had their ban reversed. It wasn’t Suzanne Humphries. My mistake. Also, while I’m typing – the announcement that the case starts next week has now been removed from the website. Looks like my sharing of this on the AAAV Facebook page got out to them!

Edit (14/1) – Further information. The AVrN claimed in an update on January 6 that they had retained the services of barister Jeremy Harrison of the Wentworth Chambers in Sydney, and Mark Robinson of the Maurice Byers Chambers. There is no such barrister in the Wentworth Chambers. There is however a Mark Robinson in the Maurice Byers Chambers, but on the basis of the first one – I doubt he even knows about this.

G&B Lawyers continue to fail

I am really getting sick and tired of G&B Lawyers and it’s main mouth, Nathan Buckly (no relation to the ex Collingwood AFL coach).

This is the High Court decision he is talking about;

What Buckley doesn’t note, is that in 1946 the people voted in a referendum to effectively over rule this decision by approving the amending of the Constitution by adding Section 51 (xxiiiA). So as a result the points he puts are no longer correct;

1. Vaccinations and immunizations are matters that fall within the category of ‘quarantine’.

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

As of the amendment, no it does not. It falls within the category of medical and dental services.

2. Only the Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’ under section 51(ix) of the Constitution.

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

As of the insertion of the amendment, not true.

3. The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization (which are quarantine matters).

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

There are NO laws that REQUIRE vaccination. There are laws that provide for a penalty for not vaccinating. The choice still exists. And it is empowered by Section 48 of the Disability Discrimination Act at a federal level. In Victoria (my home state) the empowerment lies loosely in Section 86 of the Equal Opportunity Act.

4. The States have no power to make laws with respect to quarantine, including matters dealing with vaccinations and immunizations (as Latham CJ held that these things are ‘quarantine’ matters).

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

As of the insertion of the amendment, not so.

5. The States are unable to do something that the Commonwealth is prohibited from doing under the exercise of the quarantine power.

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

Whilst this might be true, as of the amendment it is now irrelevant.

6. Therefore the States cannot pass any law that requires citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization.

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

See what I said in point 3 above.

7. Part 3B of the Public Health (COVID-19 Air Transportation Quarantine) Order (No 2) (NSW) 2021 is invalid.

G&B Lawyers Facebook page on July 1, 2021

I looked this up, and no it’s not. This order forms part of the responsibilities in quarantine (this has nothing to do with anything mentioned above by the way) that were returned to the States by the Commonwealth by agreement on March 27, 2020 in order to establish and maintain hotel quarantine. The last amendment to this order was a direct result of patient zero in the current Sydney outbreak and consequent lockdown. He was unvaccinated. The fact that this is about the international border makes that fact very important, on top of the fact that the ability to provide a penalty for the wrong choice still does not take away said choice.

Buckley – get out of this. You have already proven that you don’t care about community health. You are putting civil rights first, and COVID will trample all over that attitude. It already has in Sydney because that idiot driver has the same attitude and if the Premier hadn’t locked Greater Sydney and the surrounds down the number of infections would be at the same levels it was in Victoria nearly twelve months ago and increasing.

Keep this up, and it will be a case of three strikes and you’re out – courtesy of the OLSCNSW via NCAT!

G&B Lawyers get off too easy

This is not good enough, but there is nothing anyone can do about it.

On May 20, 2021, Nathan Buckley of G&B Lawyers copped the following penalties for unsatisfactory professional conduct from the Law Society of New South Wales;

  1. A fine of $2,500
  2. An instruction to undertake and complete further legal education
  3. A reprimand

This was for the following charges;

  1. Statements encouraging breaches of law
  2. Making unfounded allegations against other practitioners
  3. Failure to provide information to the regulatory authority
  4. Offensive, threatening and/or abusive language and threatening to institute legal proceedings

This was nothing more than a slap on the wrist, especially given that this isn’t the first time this fool has been called out. On January 31, 2020, he was also canned for unsatisfactory professional conduct for acting unethically in the course of legal practice by sending correspondence which was threatening, abusive and/or discourteous. In other words (per the fourth charge on the second report) he has form.

What really annoys me was the fact that the first charge only attracting the penalties given (combined with the others). That first charge by itself should have been worth a suspension or at the very least being referred to the disciplinary tribunal. Along with the fact that his false information about COVID-19 and the vaccine attracted nothing alongside his anti vax stance in general – a factor that is still going through the legal processes. In the last entry here I celebrated two Fair Work Commission decisions protecting mandatory vaccinations in child care and aged care. Buckley has led an appeal against the Kimber decision and this is being heard before the full bench of the FWC on June 28. In yet another act of unprofessionalism – Buckley has invited the public to attend. Now whilst this is permitted there are severe restrictions in place right now due to the pandemic – yet again, Buckley is showing no respect for it. The limit in the room is 20 people, including all parties. I did contact the FWC office in Sydney about this and plans are in place to handle it.

The grounds for appeal according to the website are limited. It can only be done in an error of law, or an error of fact. I can only see a possibility of the latter and that can only be the ruling that Kimber was unable to be vaccinated – unless something was missing. Beyond that there is an option to appeal to the Federal Court, but only on a question of law.

Bottom line – I am watching this guy. He is unprofessional and dangerous. If he crosses the line again I will report him (again) to the OLSC in New South Wales.

G&B Lawyers stance set back

Justice has prevailed in part.

Two matters G&B Lawyers brought before the Fair Work Commission trying to undermine the mandatory requirement of the flu vaccination in specific settings (one in child care and the other in aged care) have been dismissed in a valuable precedent supporting the need to protect young children and elderly Australians from disease – in particular all mutations of influenza.

The two anti vaccine applicants – Bou-Jamie Barber and Jennifer Kimber – tried to claim their sacking from their respective jobs was unfair in the face of both of them refusing to get the flu vaccination when it was mandatory. Barber tried to claim an exemption based on a flimsily presented claim of a “sensitive immune system” and an unproven claim to a reaction to the flu vaccine in 2010. Kimber claimed a reaction to a 2016 flu shot that was not proven to be related. Basically in both cases they failed to prove there was an actual issue – therefore, their refusal of the mandatory vaccine was grounds for dismissal. The FWC supported these actions.

This boils back to G&B Lawyers just refusing to do their homework. When one has a reaction you do all in your power to ensure it’s cause is found and proven first. It’s another example of my previous blog entry here; “Once and for all – prove it!” Not only that, there was much made about a nurse who got the COVID-19 vaccine earlier this year and suffered an anaphylactic shock. She had a history of such a reaction to vaccines and yet she still went ahead with it and prepared for the contingency. She knew how important it was – and I doff my hat to her for being so gutsy. This is the sort of attitude others in her position should take. Be prepared for the worst, even if it’s highly unlikely at best and next to impossible at worst.

Bottom line – do NOT claim exemptions or otherwise without solid proof. Anti vax attitudes (which Barber was definitely guilty of) are not protected before the law. The FWC has set a marvelous precedent here and G&B Lawyers should get off that bandwagon and quick smart.

AVrN cuts back on Facebook

It is with delight that I announce that the Australian Vaccination-risks Network has all but given up on Facebook. This is good news. No more new posts – or to put it another way, no more regurgitating lies and baseless innuendo about vaccines. At least not in the written form. Founder and spiritual leader Meryl Dorey continues to lie though on her little video show Under the Wire – which is still being shared on the page and is now their only content going forward.

Under the Triple AV page I put a comment, and I fully expect it to be burned on sight so I took a screenshot as soon as it was posted in order and here it is;

Shadow banning (AKA stopping advertising and searching) is the right thing to do with wrong medical information. To say otherwise is medical mischeif to put it lightly – the very same medical mischeif they claim vaccines are. The vaccination program is flexible. Doctors have the right to alter the schedule to suit the needs of their patients, certainly in the short term. For example some vaccines are not to be administered is a child is running a certain temperature. To assume the program is hard and fast with no wriggle room for wholly acceptable medical reasons is outright rubbish.

Hopefully there will be no regrouping. Of course Dorey and her lackeys will try. They can’t stand the lack of attention – much like Donald Trump. And they are just as deluded and have little to no connection with the real world. Parler is pretty much gone for good and the others will eventually fall into line with medical fact (and other stuff that should not be seeing the light of day in social media). Lying in such important areas will disappear entirely because it has to.

I will keep an eye out for their so called FAQ. And I will also be watching for their filthy bus should it be announced that they are coming to Victoria. Not if I have any say in it!

G&B Lawyers want Australia to be sick

This is ridiculous!

Yesterday the numbskulls at G&B Lawyers shared a picture of the front page of the morning’s Brisbane Courier Mail, which had a big headline in big bold letters – “The Jab or your job”. The sub header was “Queensland’s biggest employers consider ‘no jab no pay’ policy to force workers to get vaccine”.

Two points – first, no decision has been made yet. Everyone is watching the US and the UK as the Pfizer vaccine is being distributed. There hasn’t been such interest in a vaccine I think probably ever. Maybe the polio vaccine got lots of attention, but the ability of the media to spread the word was limited then. It’s not now.

Second – and more importantly – G&B lawyers yet again are proving that they are not taking COVID-19 seriously. This attitude they have persisted with basically since July is one of the many reasons they are in fact in trouble with the New South Wales Law Society and consequently the state’s Legal Services Commissioner. It’s plain for anyone to see – they want people to catch COVID-19. They are against any lockdowns – one of our main defences pre vaccine – and they are also against masks (having earlier this week filed in the Federal Court in a matter involving a refusal to employ someone who could not wear a mask). This case is in fact very similar to the challenge to South Australia’s No Jab No Play laws. There’s a killer blow for both cases – section 48 of the Disability Discrimination Act, allowing for discrimination on the basis of an infectious disease.

The reality is this – G&B Lawyers are claiming human rights over disease prevention. Anyone who is not vaccinated (good reason or not) is a threat to herd immunity. That is why Qantas started this thought bubble about keeping those who aren’t vaccinated away. Herd immunity is ESSENTIAL for a vaccine to work long term, and that is not just based in the whole community (like the whole of Melbourne for instance). It applies on a smaller scale as well – whether it be a day care centre, a kindergarten, an aged care facility or a hospital. Any other work place – especially indoors – also has to be wary.

But G&B Lawyers don’t care. The right to work comes first. The right to travel comes first as well. Late today we have a new COVID cluster on Sydney’s Northern Beaches – painfully close to the home suburb of a long time mate of mine. People have been told to stay home – as they should. But G&B Lawyers are bound to object to this.

The proof of the pudding is this tweet;

That is NOT what happened! These idiots don’t even understand vaccines, and worse they don’t even pay attention to reports! The vaccine did not cause the HIV virus! The vaccine created an immune reaction TO the HIV virus, which is not what it was supposed to do! THAT was the issue!

I am hoping that a decision is forthcoming in Adelaide – throwing that challenge out. It will create a precedent that will protect employers who have every right to keep their work place disease free, whether it be COVID or whatever else. Where herd immunity is compromised, the vaccine becomes ineffective. That’s not the fault of the vaccine. It’s the fault of the people who refuse to get it for no good reason. Herd immunity is essential for those who legitimately can’t get vaccinated for medically verified reasons. But if the cohort is too small even those who can’t be vaccinated have to be kept clear for their own safety and the safety of others. That’s the key. Those who demand the right to work over and above disease prevention are the real human rights abusers. There is one over riding human right that stands tall here – and it’s why section 48 of the DDA exists to begin with;

The right to live free of disease.

And G&B Lawyers oppose this right. I expect on January 19, 2021, they will be given a date before the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal’s Legal Disciplinary Board for unprofessional conduct. Human rights defenders my rear end!

Townsville bully strikes again

Lizard Hemp is at it again – bullying based on total and utter fiction.

She appeared on AAAV’s Facebook page and uttered a load of tripe in response to the point made about community health trumping individual desire.

The community have already spoken all right. The majority is right behind vaccines. Every poll she saw was rigged by anti vaxxers as the original article indicated. The vaccine has not been rushed because research had already been done on COVID’s relative – SARS. The real majority support a vaccine because they know it’s the only way to stop this thing once and for all. Real majority – AKA a democracy.

The accusation that I was attacking mental health when I mentioned community health is a massive goal post shift. Community health represents protection from preventable disease. All decisions by the individual MUST take the community into account when it needs to. Hempel is opposed to this, and in the process shows no respect for being a part of said community. The core choice is simple – do what is needed to permanently prevent COVID-19. And there is only one way – vaccinate. If you don’t, you are compromising herd immunity and placing the community at risk. A breach of herd immunity renders the vaccine ineffective.

This one I have to break down so I don’t miss anything.

“You cannot threaten to sue or use restraining orders to silence people you have openly bullied for a number of years.”

I have not threatened either of those. The silencing will come in another method and it’s more than one. Any bullying is in response to being bullied – eg being told vaccines are dangerous in a manner that is designed to prevent opposition – or being told vaccines cause Autism (which is hate speech against the Autistic community).

“People you have suggested are child abusers and neglectors…people whose name and partial address you have publicly included on your little ‘hate list’.”

It’s not a suggestion. It’s an opinion that I hold to be fact. Location is not a partial address.

“That would be called abusing and gaming the system for your own self interest and ego gratification.”

It is none of that. It’s a public service.

“There are people out there in real need of protection.”

Yes and they either have it, or don’t have it because of idiots like you.

“In my opinion, you are not one of them.”

So come at me, coward!

“You are just a d-head on a power trip.”

No, that’s you.

“And before you claim to feel ‘scared’ of me, remember the sh*t you wrote about me. Remember your laughing emojis.”

Everyone should be afraid of an idiot who wants children to die from preventable disease. I wrote nothing that wasn’t true or valid opinion.

“Certainly not the actions of any man who is in fear for his safety.”

I fight. You obviously don’t understand the concept.

“Remember the fact that I’m up here and you’re down there and I have three autistic kids to look after.”

So do that and do it right – and get out of the anti vax field entirely. Distance means nothing on the Internet, and when it comes to legal action distance doesn’t matter there either.

“You are literally nothing to me because I have a higher calling in life and you are not a part of that.”

And yet you commented on the Facebook page. Way to be a hypocrite. You are a part of the community – like it or not. And in this smaller world we now live in, the community of North Queensland can have an effect on central Victoria (and south west Western Australia etc etc).

“You are just a lonely little soul who occasionally likes to dangle a red flag in front of a bulls face to draw attention to himself and then cry victim when you finally get it.
Your groups. Your egotistical gloating. Your hatred.”

This is what I’m talking about. Abuse with no validity to try and make me cower in a corner as she thinks I should be if I’m afraid. Well I’m not doing it. She’s the one dangling the red flag in front of the bull here!

“All cries for the attention and admiration that you feel you deserve and never received in life.”

Says the idiot who doesn’t have the connections and successes I have!

“The incredible irony is, you have openly crossed the line from opinion to bullying on many occasions.”

You’ve done it even more than I have, and unlike me with NO provocation.

“But I guess you don’t feel the rules apply to you.
They do.”

They apply to you in the first instance.

“This will be my last time addressing your pathetic loathing for humanity.”

You are the one who loathes humanity.

“I’ve spent far too much time already debunking your ludicrous claims and attempts to divide and conquer human beings by engineering hatred and spinning half-truths, opinions loosely disguised as fact.”

You wasted your time because you debunked squat. You got nowhere near me. It’s you who is trying to do all that, and don’t like it when people like me and plenty of others strike back with actual facts. Not opinions. Facts.

“You acknowledge none of it because it doesn’t suit your narrative.”

That’s you again.

“You just close your eyes, plug your ears and sing ‘la la la’ and throw another one of your infantile tantrums.”

That’s you yet again. And this is the biggest tantrum YOU have tossed in your history.

“You want people to pander to the fiction that is you, the carefully crafted narrative that you put on public display to intimidate all who would challenge your hateful digression from unity and compassion.”

You have no compassion and are against unity. I deal in facts. You deal in fiction.

“Reputation is all to you because it’s all you are. Beyond that, you are hollow and I suspect everything that was ever written about you was just a ‘story’.”

Oh trying to go low now are we? It’s you who fits that criteria. Outside of family you are nothing.

“Whilst all stories might start out interesting, some start to lose their lustre as one flicks through the pages. You are one such story. Overrated. Overhyped and not worth a second read.”

My book isn’t finished yet. Far from it. And you are going to hate the ending.

“So enjoy your dark little existence, such as it is.”

Try saying that to all my friends – of which I have more than you’ll ever have.

“Put your red flag away, because they’ll be no more scraps of attention for you.
Bye de bye and good luck finding the real you.
I strongly feel that this isn’t it.”

Yes it is and you can’t stand it. You are the one who is scared because the truth about you has been exposed by simply being on the AV Name Check. The truth about me is that I fight for justice. I have already won in court (outside of this issue of course) multiple times. I have won in life as well. And I’ll continue to win – and the biggest victory of all will be when I get the ultimate victory – anti vaxxers who have no valid medical reason to oppose vaccines in jail for inciting child neglect.

Oh and when the claim that vaccines cause Autism is officially and legally classified as hate speech.

Your life needs to change, Hempel. Mine is fine. Yours is a sad existence as it is with all anti vaxxers who won’t acknowledge the truth. That vaccines are safe and effective when used correctly. And interfering in herd immunity – like I said – prevents the vaccine from effective use. That is on people like YOU! No respect for humanity.

And banned from the page (want to say something? Show you have the ticker and post here, Hempel).

G & B Lawyers – Medically incompetent

I’ll preamble this entry with a couple of notes – G & B Lawyers don’t take COVID-19 seriously. They are seeking to re-open borders immediately despite the continuing presence of the virus without any defence other than the restrictions we presently have and clearly don’t care about the consequences. For example just today they said; “There is no medical evidence whatsoever to support the ongoing direction for Victorians to wear a mask. Masks are of zero health benefit to anyone. Chairman Dan is simply a control freak.”

The story they are talking about said nothing about any actual challenge based on any medical advice. It was all about the Premier not being happy with a regional MP calling for masks to be made optional in regional Victoria – which would undermine the effort especially on the fringes (like the Macedon Ranges where I live – where yesterday there were still two active cases). G & B Lawyers have no evidence that fitted masks don’t work. The claim is rubbish.

Okay, this is American – but it’s no less relevant and comes from professionals. Masks work.

Another note – G & B Lawyers are also into conspiracy theories, stating in response to another story; “This is obvious”.

The story merely mentioned the conspiracy theory, and then shot it down as it deserved to be. It’s clear that G & B lawyers didn’t actually read the story. Nor do they get that the measures China took didn’t work as well as certainly they did here or more importantly in New Zealand. And we have great examples of countries who ignored the tactic – the USA and Brazil. G & B Lawyers can say “Chairman Dan” all they want – it doesn’t make it valid. Where are the “Chairperson Jacinda” jibes? Nowhere. Totally inconsistent. Moreover, China’s numbers are still way worse than ours – as I type this Wikipedia (with the appropriate source) has China’s total case load at 85,372 and 4,634 deaths. They have 185 active cases as well. In Australia we have had 27,044 total cases and only 875 deaths. We have more active cases of course (455) due to the ongoing recovery from Victoria’s second wave. It says plenty.

But the main reason for this entry is their act of total medical incompetence over No Jab No Play and related matters regarding compulsory vaccination for workers in day care and aged care – specifically the flu vaccine. I take the following from their Go Fund Me which should have been deleted and hasn’t been for some reason;

The updates are as follows;

AUGUST 12, 2020
Today we had a matter listed in the Fair Work Commission. It was the first telephone conciliation for this particular client.
Our client was terminated from the client’s job at an aged care facility in NSW for not having a flu vaccination when the client had a medical certificate that was in the approved form issued by NSW Health and in accordance with the Public Health Order (No 2) 2020 (NSW).
The respondent aged care facility did not agree to reinstate our client.
We will now have this matter determined by a Member of the Fair Work Commission.
Mr Jim Pearce, barrister has been engaged to appear for our client.
This is certainly looking like our test case.
If the Member of the Commission refuses to reinstate our client, our intention is to appeal the decision to the Full Bench of the Commission.
Thank you for your ongoing support.

AUGUST 28, 2020
Today we were before the Commissioner for a conference in the matter I referred to in the last update. The matter still hasn’t settled. So our test case continues. Keep sharing the campaign.
I’m also aware that a number of Goodstart Early Learning employees have been fired for not having flu and whooping cough injections. If you are one of those employees get in touch with Nathan. We can run a class action for you. <<

We are now taking on Goodstart Early Learning for terminating employees for not having a flu shot.

The Commonwealth Government plans to take away your rights to an education, employment and overseas travel. Read the second paragraph. You can’t make this stuff up.

SEPTEMBER 16, 2020
Big week next week in the Fair Work Commission. Conciliations with Goodstart and an aged care facility for firing employees for not having a flu vaccination. Bring it on.

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020
Goodstart did not settle at conciliation today. So we now progress to a Commissioner. Essentially Goodstart’s position is that in their view it is a lawful direction to engage in assault and battery without the consent of the employee. Such a direction can never be lawful. Please share this update widely to get further support for our client who was unlawfully terminated by Goodstart.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2020
Had another conciliation terminated today. This time it is Resthaven Incorporated, an aged care provider in SA who fired our client for not having a flu vaccination. We crack on to a Commissioner.

First, I’ll just reference the quote from September 6 – this is a reference to the standard letter from Medicare about immunisation’s being overdue. G & B Lawyers assert that it’s a blanket threat to their access to all education, employment or travel overseas. That is scaremongering at it’s finest. At worst all three could be restricted somewhat, but eliminated entirely? Absolutely not!

A background on the other parties. Goodstart Early Learning has centres in every state and territory in Australia totaling 644 facilities. The assertion of “assault and battery” is difficult to believe. I would suggest they are being facetious with the definition. Resthaven, as indicated, is an aged care provider that has 12 facilities in South Australia – 9 in Adelaide and the others in Murray Bridge, Port Elliot and Mount Gambier. The other aged care facility in New South Wales isn’t named.

The mention of Public Health Order (No 2) relates to COVID-19 from what I can tell. The claim on August 12 appears to suggest that the employee couldn’t have the flu vaccine for a legitimate medical reason. Under normal circumstances this would be fair enough – except in one circumstance that actually exists at present. The threat posed by COVID-19 makes herd immunity from the flu even more important than usual until such time as a vaccine for that is available. There will be a number of residents who could not be vaccinated for the same reason, meaning that employing someone with such a restriction would be too risky. Unjustifiable hardship would apply in that instance. The employer is therefore quite within their rights to say “No”.

I certainly hope the Fair Work Commission see this. Of course that argument would have to be presented to them and I can’t dictate that.

I’ll also take this opportunity to briefly address a document that was presented over the Supreme Court of South Australia case in similar terms. It was written by their barrister Julian Burnside QC, who I would have thought would know better than to get involved in this with his human rights history. I will be reviewing the document in a future entry once I get my podcast out of the way this week.

Bottom line – G & B Lawyers are medically incompetent. They are trying to undermine the flu vaccine and place our senior citizens and our young children in danger from the flu. And the flu is dangerous. I know. It nearly killed me in July 2014, and I was (and still am to a degree) a fit person for someone my age. I wasn’t vaccinated. Dumb move and will never happen again. Same goes for everyone else. Get the flu jab if you don’t have a legitimate medical reason not to. If you do – don’t bother working in child care or aged care because you are a threat to herd immunity. You have plenty of other employment options.

And hopefully the present proceedings against G & B Lawyers presently being investigated by the Law Society of New South Wales result in them being thrown out of legal practice.

Batshit Crazy Solihin Millin arrested

And no surprise – the loyal cult followers are up in arms!

The term “Batshit crazy” aren’t my words by the way. They were the rightful words of Victoria’s Deputy Police Commissioner Luke Cornelius. And you can see here the source of his remark.

It is plain that the Deputy Commissioner was given a brief of the contents of Millin’s desktop. This will undoubtedly include his High Court paperwork and the other material I have reviewed previously on this blog. After seeing that brief, Luke knew that Millin was a total nutcase. Not to mention this;

So all of Millin’s rantings were recorded as well. This adds to the genuine truth behind the Deputy Commissioner’s comment.

Millin’s arrest is for organising the September 5 Freedom Protest in Melbourne – for inciting others into committing a criminal act. Under the State of Disaster, restrictions are in place that are enforceable by criminal law. Flouting those restrictions by themselves is a criminal act and warrants the minimum of a fine – whether it be $200 for not wearing a mask without a lawful reason or the higher fines. Demanding an end to the lockdown instantly for one’s freedom is not an option. Our freedom was removed by a deadly disease called COVID-19 – something that Millin believes doesn’t exist because it hasn’t been isolated. It has been isolated – it is impossible to have a vaccine at the human trial stage (it’s actually more than one) without such an isolation. Millin is only saying that because of his long held demented view about vaccines in general and he doesn’t want this one any more than any of the others.

His followers are just as nuts and it wouldn’t surprise me if there was a brief on Millin’s Facebook timeline and the comments on there as well. I mean look at some of these gems!

A hero?? He’s a reckless traitor! The rest of that is downright stupid and dangerous. If that happened we would have a jump in cases without a doubt undoing all the good work we’ve done.

He has a black heart. There has been no injustice here.

You don’t know what Nazi Germany was, idiot! If this was Nazi Germany, Millin would be dead and so would the rest of you as you would have been found and executed as enemies of the state right alongside him.

Another inaccurate reference to Nazi Germany. The fight is over because it is the wrong fight. The right fight is being fought against COVID-19.

Teffaha is the wrong person to contact in this. She is useless – a failed whistleblower from the tax office who tried and failed to take her issue to the Federal Court.

Harmless? He is spreading blatant lies about a number of things and is the real threat to humanity as he isn’t taking COVID-19 seriously!

He deserves nothing but derision as as I said in the previous entry about him – a jail term.

It’s perfectly lawful. The charges are correct.

You can’t take them back because COVID-19 will knock you over if you try.

I laughed when I saw this. Thanks for the publicity, dummy! This blog by the way isn’t dedicated to Millin.

This was a reply to Ick’s comment. I’m not an anti-truther. I tell the truth. You lot wouldn’t know the truth if it hit you on the back of the head.

This was also a reply and I laughed at this one as well. I don’t get a cent from Big Pharma! If I was working for them I haven’t been paid! Where’s my cheque huh? LMAO!

Oh we know enough about him to know he’s out of his mind, Ick!


See this is a classic example of what I’m talking about! DNA altering vaccines? GMO’d humans? Real life isn’t the Sci-Fi channel, you goose! And no wonder – look at her surname!

This isn’t inciting freedom. It’s inciting criminal conduct. Clear as glass.

Here’s another classic example of what I’m talking about! Crazy! The Australia Act was assented by the Queen, streamlining the assent process and making it quicker by passing the job to the Governor General – the monarch’s representative per the Constitution. The reference to Culleton is about his claim that he was removed from the Senate illegally – which was BS as he was an undischarged bankrupt and had a court matter that had a maximum term of two years active at the time of his election as a Senator. He has nothing to complain about and is not a “Senator in Exile”. The nonsense about “ship” and the “red flag” is an irrelevant reference to the Navy’s red ensign.

Oh what rot! The PEOPLE voted for Federation and have voted for every Federal Parliament since! It’s called a democracy!

There will be no prosecutions because there is no fraud.

How dare this idiot invoke Nelson Mandela! That’s an insult! Not to mention what he did with his name!

This is null and void when such an action threatens the health of the community. Community health takes priority.

For what? For doing their job per state law? Such a class action wouldn’t get past the court registrar because it’s frivolous and vexatious.

You haven’t lost it, moron! The present plan is to rid the country of COVID-19. This witch is against that obviously.

This isn’t about Freedom of Speech. It’s about inciting a criminal act. There is no Communism.

He isn’t speaking the truth. The only tyranny is being attempted by COVID-19 and the narrative is to control that. You are being governed by a government who cares. If you don’t want that – get out of Australia! We don’t want reckless manslaughtering anarchists like you here!

After repeating her previously shown comment she put this with an anti Semitic addition. Goldman Sachs is a Jewish bank and the claims made there are consistent with the Rothschild Family conspiracy junk that is absolutely anti Jew and therefore anti Semitic.

She repeated this one twice as well.

No it won’t – unless one is pro getting on top of this pandemic and supportive of the actions being taken. It will be a horrible day for Millin, and fabulous day for Victorians who are doing the right thing. And yeah – a fabulous day for yours truly!

I don’t need to say anything to this one.

I think this (combined with the previous comment) is proof that Millin is a cult leader and this follower is totally in his power. He needs help.

Justice will be served when Millin is brought before the courts and found guilty. There is no fascism in this state. Fascism is a right wing mantra – the Andrews government is left wing.

It’s COVID-19 that’s doing that, and Millin is standing up for it destroying us.

Because it’s the perfect way to catch dangerous old farts like Millin who think they are invincible and have no respect for the real world.

We have a right to be scared of idiots like you lot – you are threatening the entire community with a third wave of COVID-19! Yes you haven’t gone out yet, and you aren’t going to in order to make sure COVID-19 is under control! What will happen IF you do? You’ll be fined and maybe arrested if you don’t give and prove your correct identity. That is on you and no one else. STAY HOME!!

Okay this one clearly needs help. The jobs will be back as will the businesses and the homes. Freedom of movement will also return. There is a future post COVID-19 and you should embrace it and not assume it won’t be there. That attitude is only for cowards.

The ultimate human rights breach has been committed by COVID-19. It has to be controlled and everything needs to be put on hold to preserve lives. That is what we are doing. That is what New Zealand did and they opened up for three months. The US never did it and they are the worst afflicted in the world. Brazil never did it either and are second worst afflicted. That is what would be facing us if we treat COVID-19 like it doesn’t exist. They can do what they did and the book will be thrown at Millin.

There is a lot more but I have to stop there as I want to upload this as quickly as possible. I encourage the prosecution to ensure that this moron is put in a padded cell, proverbially speaking. Thomas Embling Hospital would be the obvious choice, but maybe the mental health ward at the Alfred would be more practical. Either way, I hope the circumstances prevail that warrant a Court Assessment Order under the Mental Health Act. Millin is a nutcase – fruitcake standard.

Hopefully by the time his case comes up the restrictions will be to a level that I am able to attend. That depends if it is being expedited or not.

And the rest of you? STAY HOME ON SEPTEMBER 5 (and on all other dates in Victoria until at least September 14)!!

Should Australia have a no fault compensation system for vaccines?

I’m doing this blog entry in reply to an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this morning;

I want to focus in particular on this quote;

He (Dr Omar Korshid – AMA President) backed calls for the federal government to establish a no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme before rolling out a COVID-19 vaccine.
“If society is asking everyone to get vaccinated to protect each other, we have a collective responsibility to look after the very rare and unfortunate individuals who are harmed by vaccines.”

What Dr Korshid doesn’t acknowledge is that those very people who claim to have been harmed by vaccines won’t come forward. Having said that, the promise of compensation could bring them out of the woodwork.

I’m not a fan of what amounts to bribery for a start, but the other concern I would have is if the proposed compensation scheme exactly duplicates that of the United States. If it does I will oppose that with every fibre of my being.

Here’s why;

1. The US system is based at the core on the misleading assertion that vaccines are “inherently unsafe”. This has led to a system that does NOT acknowledge system error or failure (eg Fluvax) or practitioner error. This later one has the perfect example from the United States – Hannah Poling. The US compensation system recognises that situation as a situation caused solely by the vaccines concerned (it was more than one – between five and nine in the one visit), and totally exonerated the administrator of the vaccine. This result was exacerbated by the US government conceding the case without a hearing. I will not support a system that doesn’t punish the administrator of the vaccine for doing the wrong thing. I hold the very firm view that any claimed injury – if it is genuine – is from there.

2. The US system is laid out in a separate jurisdiction – the Court of Federal Claims (AKA the Vaccine Court). This court does not hold to the normal standards of evidence presented. The burden of proof is – colloquially – 50 percent and a feather. In other words, all you have to do is establish that vaccine injury was the most likely cause of the issue. That is just plain wrong and does nothing to assist in the understanding of any genuine issue if there is one. The idea of compensation at the core is to prove that compensation is warranted. To do that, a proper investigation is required – not just for the benefits of legal precedent as such for the compensation itself, but also for science as there might be lessons that science will find useful to increase vaccine safety even further. There is always something new. Science evolves.

3. The US system hasn’t stopped anti vaxxers from complaining. In fact it has exacerbated the issue it was originally supposed to fix. The way their system has been laid out over simplifies matters – which while that helps struggling families conversely harms the structure needed to make it all work properly and as intended (to stop people from taking big pharma to court instead and waste their money that they need to be using to do their job in research and development).

Now all this doesn’t mean I am opposed to the idea. In fact – if it’s done correctly to the proper standards of proof and investigation and holds an existing jurisdiction at federal level (the Family Court would be the place to be expanded to cope with this given that these claims are family orientated and has an effect on families primarily) – I would be all for it. The thing about that sort of environment is that it would force families to bring out the medical records of their loved one (especially if it’s a child) but maintain the existing privacy of the Family Court so that wouldn’t become a circus per se. That would form part of the investigation. This all fits in to what I have mentioned previously on this blog in the “Once and for all – prove it” entry from back in January 2017. It’s all about using science to learn from any issues and further improve safety. But how can science do that when all these claims only make their way to biased soap boxes of deceit like the Vaxxed bus? They talk about giving these people a voice. That sort of soap box will be ignored because it is random, uncontrolled and subject to emotion based speculation and no scientific facts.

So the other aspect of a vaccine compensation scheme that I would approve of is the ability for an existing authority to receive a report of a vaccine injury claim (a version of a whistle blowing if you like) from any member of the public – and said authority having the ability (subject to a confirmation that there could be an issue there) to bring the case before the court to ascertain the claim. It would gag the nutcases who are not telling the truth, or give them compensation if there is an actual issue as well as providing the benefit I already pointed to for science.

While I’m typing this, I also want to comment on the current application – the proposed (and not confirmed yet) vaccine for COVID-19. Scientists are warning against making it a requirement so early due to the long testing process being fast tracked. I don’t mean fast tracked to Russian standards (that was way too fast). I mean the current track being followed in particular by Oxford. The AMA is still favouring education over aversive methods like no jab no pay and no jab no play as examples. Now given that COVID-19 poses more of a threat to adults than children I would for now support not using the latter. The experience with Fluvax would be enough proof of that. And the present version of no jab no pay is also keyed towards the kids so that would need a different variety of aversive penalty.

In the early stages of the roll out, the only thing I would be prohibiting for those who refuse to be vaccinated is overseas travel – should the international border be re-opened. I would certainly be requiring those coming in to be vaccinated. I honestly believe that those who work in hospitals and aged care need to have the vaccine as well, in order to protect the vulnerable (both in terms of age and otherwise exposed as such). There may be other options but it doesn’t need to go over in any blanket manner – at least not yet. Once the efficacy is well and truly established that can follow then. But that shouldn’t be until at least 2025. That is when we need to start punishing the fools who claim COVID-19 is a hoax (even though we should really be punishing them right now!) and use that to refuse the vaccine. By that time hopefully that conspiracy BS will have been dealt with.

But if I know the anti vaxxers – they’ll still be running their collective mouths. I just hope that I can gag them on one of their pet lines personally. The hate speech claim that vaccines cause Autism. It doesn’t, and that’s all I’m gonna say about that!