Heidi Reeble: Arrogant, Hostile Anti Vaxxer

I do like having four Facebook accounts in my name. It comes in handy when anti vaxxers pre-emptively block me on the two accounts they know about – my political one and my personal one (the two that I admin AAAV from with my three fellow admins).

In this case it was my wrestling account that I used to take these screenshots after FT informed me of the comments by Heidi Reeble, a Dane who has some things to learn about vaccines. She started badly with this claim on the story about Victorian Health Minister Jill Hennessy getting the flu shot;

Blatantly claiming that the flu vaccines causes strokes was out of line, and Christine McKewen was onto that calling the comment “disgraceful”. Reeble’s reply?

Just saying what?? How many strokes have there been that can be directly connected to the flu vaccine? I can answer that – NONE! It’s typical anti vax chatter that drives me up the wall!

This was a pretty petty jibe and Christine shot back accusing Reeble of being afraid of the truth as well as noting that the list of side effects was “meaningless” and “wrong”. Reeble played yet another anti vax card in reply;

Christine was absolutely right in reply – what vaccine injured person? I go back again to my “Once and for all – Prove it” entry on this blog in January 2017. There is no proof. As Christine said, they don’t exist and she called Reeble “a disgrace to the human race”. That caused Reeble to run for it, thus;

What a coward! And Christine jumped on her for her lack of community responsibility. Reeble hit the laughing emoticon at that and then uttered this tripe;

Most of the childhood vaccines don’t need boosters in adult life so Reeble lied. Reeble’s call should be heeded by her. Doctor’s advice is needed for these but she would be against that – just get the shots no matter what. How careless and irresponsible is that, huh? Completely owned, and Christine let her have it again smashing Reeble on herd immunity including an admission that she wouldn’t get the jab if others won’t because the others put her in danger. I don’t agree with that even though I can understand the thought line. But I do agree with Christine calling on Reeble to get re-educated on vaccine safety, disease and so on.

That was when LB got involved through the AAAV account and when I first became aware of it, pointing out that Reeble’s lack of understanding of the science of vaccines made her dangerous. Reeble shot back with this;

Ran away from the challenge again! And FT jumped in through the AAAV account pointing to her comments being on public display and that her comments were prejudiced against proven science. He confirmed that anyone against that was dangerous – attracting another laughing emoticon from Reeble, as well as this;

She DID speak about science! What is the claim about strokes being caused by vaccines? SCIENCE! Junk science, but science nevertheless! Ditto the claim to vaccine injury – AND her claim that pro vaxxers were concealing vaccine side effects! What a mess! No idea what she’s talking about at all! Funny how she tries to call Christine and AAAV (FT and LB) on no evidence when she presents none herself! No one was changing the subject. She was just trying to avoid the debate!

And there you go – instantly contradicts herself by talking about science!

And then adds rubbish to divert attention! FT struck back brilliantly calling her out on that and stating rightly that science in vaccines is settled. It’s not sales driven and it is only politically driven when lives are threatened, especially children’s lives! FT didn’t say that – I did now as an addition. LB then added that Reeble was being added to the AV Name Check – albeit not in the same way I do. Reeble responded after blocking the AAAV page thinking no one could see it;

You’ll care, Reeble! I have already given notice of the meaning of “legal action forthwith” on the list, even though you’re on another part! And she still denied arguing about science! She also claimed that by allowing others to vaccinate she wasn’t anti vax. WRONG! A blatant lie! She was scaremongering with the first comment as well as the other anti vax rhetoric like I said.

Yes you are supposed to prove something! You are supposed to prove that vaccines cause strokes! The side effect list is not proof! It’s supposition provided by the compromised VAERS. So you need to back it up! By lying about the flu vaccine, you have failed the test of supporting vaccines. And that is why you are inherently arrogant, hostile and a threat to children’s lives. All opponents of vaccines are that, and for that – as you were already advised…

Heidi Reeble – inciter of child neglect. Live with it, idiot! Because it’s true based on YOUR words!

And the next update has just happened by the way….


The true meaning of critical thinking

One of the common arguments being put forward by anti vaxxers towards those of us who support vaccines is that we are unable to engage in critical thinking. It’s an argument that doesn’t wash when it comes down to brass tacks, when one actually understands what critical thinking is, and more importantly what it’s not.

Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.

It entails the examination of those structures or elements of thought implicit in all reasoning: purpose, problem, or question-at-issue; assumptions; concepts; empirical grounding; reasoning leading to conclusions; implications and consequences; objections from alternative viewpoints; and frame of reference. Critical thinking — in being responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes — is incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking, among them: scientific thinking, mathematical thinking, historical thinking, anthropological thinking, economic thinking, moral thinking, and philosophical thinking.

Critical Thinking as Defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking, 1987

Yes that’s 30 years old but it’s a definition that stands the test of time.

Now what brought this subject to my attention was a link on my website forum from one of it’s members, that makes it clear that true critical thinking does not allow for an arbitrary judgement. Heavy emphasis on the adjective I just used there, because there is a difference between an arbitrary judgement and a final judgement. The latter can only be made when all the information relevant to the subject is available.

Now let’s apply this to the Vaccine War (as I call it);

1. The anti vaxxers will claim that they have conceptualised, applied, analysed, synthesised, and/or evaluated information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. Now maybe they have, but the issue here is belief. Belief is not the final judgement and should never be, unless it is based in proven fact. And then there is the information gathered and taken into account. Now has it all been taken into account? I say in the case of the anti vaxxers it hasn’t, because they refuse to take on information that they see as biased (ie paid for by Big Pharma etc etc). And this is the key flaw. There is absolutely no foundation in this claim, so it defaults to being an assumption. It is there that the test of critical thinking fails

2. The pro vaxxers including myself have made the same claim. And like the anti vaxxers claim they have, we have as well. Now unlike the anti vaxxers we are aware of the pitfalls of belief alone in making a judgement, so we seek proven fact. That’s why in the first instance we reject the argument of bias due to lack of evidence. For example the profits made by Big Pharma, and the insistence by anti vaxxers that this is the proof when it’s an assumption based on the idea that vaccines are a part of those profits, pressing figures of money made. Accountancy is clearly not their strong point and it’s at this basic level that I have some knowledge as I studied Accounting at high school. Incoming revenue does not automatically become a profit. Simple. When expenditure is taken into account, and vaccines are expensive to manufacture compared to other Big Pharma products, any revenue is cancelled out. It’s called Profit and Loss in a Balance Sheet. Now we on the pro vax side do look at all the information, and using the very method of critical thinking combined with listening to those with the proper expertise, we are able to come to a final judgement which is far less arbitrary than the anti vaxxers.

Now let’s look at the second paragraph;

a. Purpose – Now obviously the two sides are coming from polar opposites. One sets out to prove vaccines are dangerous. The other sets out to prove vaccines are okay.

b. Problem – See what I just said.

c. Question at issue – See what I just said again.

d. Assumptions – This is the first divide as I previously covered. Anti vaxxers rely on assumptions. Pro vaxxers rely on established and proven scientific fact.

e. Concepts – Now there are plenty of these from both sides, but the anti vaxxers ignore all pro vax concepts in their so called effort at critical thinking.

f. Empirical grounding – Now here’s a real divide. The grounding of the pro vax argument is far stronger than that of the anti vax and this is based on how many holes each ground has. And the anti vax grounding speaking empirically is full of holes. The odd grounding on the pro vax side may have a couple of holes as well as no one is perfect, but we are on far firmer ground than the anti vaxxers.

g. Reasoning leading to conclusions – Now this is an area where I have criticised some anti vaxxers myself directly. Reasoning has to come from neutral ground and emotions have to be kept out of it because it clouds judgement. That’s why I get peeved at parents who yell at me that I can’t make a judgement because of one fact about me – I have no kids. That’s actually a win for me because I can reason without the emotions to interfere. The only time I may get emotional is when some upstart lights the blue touch paper with me and claims that vaccines cause Autism. And at least I’m aware of it and seek to control it. I’m not seeing anything like that on the other side of the divide.

h. Implications and consequences – Here’s another act of arbitrary judgement by the anti vaxxers, refusing to see the consequences of their efforts. That’s the return of preventable disease to it’s former levels, leading to an increase in illness and the return of death from said diseases. Anti vaxxers promote childhood disease as nothing to worry about, especially the measles which can and has killed. And what about the pressure on the health system even if there aren’t any deaths? And in the case of the measles, what about the threat of encephalitis? That’s just one example, and I could go on about influenza especially from my own experience!

i. Objections from alternative viewpoints – The height of the dispute comes out here. Reactions to objections. For a long time pro vaxxers have kept their civil tongue in, but in more recent times we’ve been fighting back. That’s why the governments of the world have started to act whether it be Australia’s No Jab No Pay, No Jab No Play at state level in Australia, SB277 in California in the United States, and so on. Anti vaxxers won’t listen to objections and insist that they are right and toss around links that have been proven to be unreliable either by direct objection to the content, or by identification of a person who is not an expert in the field or is otherwise compromised.

j. Frame of reference – Anti vaxxers try to bias this and are very quickly hauled back into line….well actually attempts are made.

As the quote states; “Critical thinking — in being responsive to variable subject matter, issues, and purposes — is incorporated in a family of interwoven modes of thinking”. Anti vaxxers refuse to interweave pro vaccine concepts, so this is another fail. Pro vaxxers do, through balancing the whole thing to the best of our ability. We think scientifically as far as our education will allow us, we think mathematically when required, we think historically – I know I certainly rely on history a lot – we recognise anthropology both in historical terms and empirical terms, we think economically, we certainly think morally and after all that philosophy is also a winner. Anti vaxxers fail on all those point. They say that they don’t but the reality is that they make their judgements based only on what they believe. As I said before – belief alone does not made for a final judgement. A final judgement must be made taking into account ALL information, and an ability to reasonably and justly set aside the incorrect information based on all critical thinking points, adopt the correct information – and proceed from there.

And if all those points are followed correctly and without emotion getting involved, a well educated person will always come to the same conclusion.

That vaccines are safe and effective when used correctly.

That is why, as a consequence of this critically thought out view that I certainly hold, I feel absolutely justified to pass out judgement on those listed on the AV Name Check. It’s not based on belief alone. It’s based on a well thought out proven scientific fact, that is yet to be proven to be wrong in a manner that ticks all the boxes of critical thinking.

Wally Cry-Shak is off his rocker

There’s an old story that the residents of the whole of New York City is divided clearly between New York State and New Jersey, and not just by the Hudson River either. By intelligence. If you’re on the NY side, you are of higher intelligence. There are exceptions of course (an old friend from the 00’s was a Jersey girl as an example), but then there are those that prove the story true. Aside from WWE loudmouth Enzo Amore, who hails from Hackensack, we also have Walter Kryshak.

This 60 plus native of the Jersey side of NYC is an anti vaxxer who is so into it he just won’t listen to anything that proves him wrong, even down to being told about compounds and backed up by the poisons liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen combining into a safe compound called fresh water (not to mention the poisons sodium and chlorine combining into a safe compound called salt!) – and not understanding a word that was being said!

Earlier this week when I updated the AV Name Check after having at him one more time on the Daily Advertiser’s story about No Jab No Play in New South Wales (why this Jersey Jerk-off thinks he can get involved in Australian business is ridiculous in itself given he has no clue of how we do things, unlike me as I do understand how they do things in the US and have criticised it as well). Of course, I gave him the list announcement meme that I think readers would be familiar with by now. And then I blocked him. I already had a mess of screenshots.

Some lowlights of his claims are primarily based in memes – in a way a lot like Frankie Vasquez and his penchant for them. Kryshak isn’t as bad as Vasquez (no death threats or foul language) but he is just as delusional at least. For instance;

Those are there to cover for errors by doctors and/or nurses. System errors as I have called them for some time now.

This is why he shouldn’t be involved – mandatory vaccinations won’t happen in Australia due to the Constitution prohibiting medical conscription. Along with the fact that the TGA would have done the study he claims hasn’t been done! Not to mention there being a book on it called “The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety” published in 2013 by the National Academies Press;

For every billion they make on vaccines they spend just as much on creation and research, and I said as much in reply as well.

They have a place when they are needed for the health of the community! Vaccines have never killed or even injured anyone by themselves and that’s a demonstrable fact. What’s child abuse is leaving a child wide open to catching a preventable disease that can kill.

See now this is the perfect example of why I am involved in this fight. This hate speech effort over the cause of Autism! Aside from the fact that this 1 in 36 figure is out of someone’s rear end, Autism has always been prevalent at much higher numbers than that 1 in 10,000! Guess who wasn’t part of that percentage? ME! If the diagnostics were right in 1980 that figure would be very different!

Then of course there were his sources;

Natural News
Vaccine Impact
Vaccine Injury News
Green Med Info
Global Research
Age of Autism
Fierce Pharma
Autism Investigated
Eco Watch (quoting quack Boyd Haley)

I also want to speak of a 21 question rant that Natural News put. Here they are – followed by my answers to the questions that Kryshak just totally ignored!

Question #1) If measles vaccines confer measles immunity, then why do already-vaccinated children have anything to fear from a measles outbreak?

Question #2) If vaccines work so well, then why did Merck virologists file a False Claims Act with the U.S. government, describing the astonishing scientific fraud of how Merck faked its vaccine results to trick the FDA?

Question #3) If vaccines don’t have any links to autism, then why did a top CDC scientist openly confess to the CDC committing scientific fraud by selectively omitting clinical trial data after the fact in order to obscure an existing link between vaccines and autism?

Question #4) If mercury is a neurotoxic chemical (which it is), then why is it still being injected into children and pregnant women via vaccines? Why does the vaccine industry refuse to remove all the mercury from vaccines in the interests of protecting children from mercury?

Question #5) If vaccines are so incredibly safe, then why does the vaccine industry need absolute legal immunity from all harm caused by its products?

Question #6) If vaccines work so well to prevent disease, then why do some vaccines (like the chickenpox vaccine) openly admit that they can cause the spread of chickenpox?

Question #7) If vaccines are so great for public health, then why do these historical public health charts show nearly all the declines in infectious disease taking place BEFORE vaccines arrived on the scene?

Question #8) If vaccines are perfectly safe, then why did at least 13 people recently die in Italy after being vaccinated?

Question #9) If vaccines are so trustworthy, then why did a pro-vaccine group in Africa recently discover — to its shock and horror — that vaccines being given to young African women were secretly laced with abortion chemicals?

Question #10) If vaccines are backed by solid science, then why do some vaccine inserts openly admit they are backed by no clinical trials?

Question #11) If vaccines are so safe, then why does this vaccine insert admit that the Gardasil vaccine causes “acute respiratory illness” in babies who consume the breast milk of mothers who have been vaccinated?

Question #12) If vaccines are so safe, then why does this Gardasil insert sheet admit that the vaccine causes “seizure-like activity, headache, fever, nausea and dizziness” and can even cause those injected with the vaccine to lose consciousness and fall, resulting in injury?

Question #13) If vaccines are totally safe, then why do vaccine insert sheets disclose a long list of frightening and bizarre side effects associated with their vaccines?

Question #14) If vaccines are backed by so much “science” then why do they frequently admit there really aren’t any studies of the vaccine for the very groups of people who are often injected with it?

Question #15) If vaccines are so safe to give to pregnant women, then why do the vaccine insert sheets openly admit most of them have never been tested for safety in pregnant women? In fact, this vaccine admits “the effects of the vaccine in fetal development are unknown.”

Question #16) If vaccines are so safe to be injected into the bodies of children and pregnant women, then why do their own insert sheets readily admit they are manufactured with a cocktail of toxic chemical ingredients including “fetal bovine serum?” (The blood serum of aborted baby cows.)

Question #17) If vaccines achieve absolute immunity, then why are as many as 97 percent of children struck by infectious disease already vaccinated against that disease?

Question #18) If vaccines are totally safe and effective, then why did this five-year-old girl recently die from the very strain of flu she was just vaccinated against?

Question #19) If the mainstream media claims to report honest, unbiased information about vaccines, then why was there a total nationwide blackout on the news of the CDC whistleblower admitting vaccines are linked to autism?

Question #20) Why does the CDC falsely claim all vaccines are completely safe and effective when its own website still lists the toxic chemical ingredients used in vaccines?

Question #21) If the vaccine industry cares so much about children, then why does it call for the arrest of parents and the breaking up of families of unvaccinated children, begging for the state to seize custody of those children at gunpoint while incarcerating the parents in prison?

That’s all I have time to put for the time being – but I think that’s enough anyway. This guy is a maniac and should be arrested for inciting child neglect. He has no idea – at all.

Jenny Coolen – Nutter from Nova Scotia

You know you’re having an effect when you get this sort of rubbish on your page!

Jenny Coolen appears to live in Hubbards in Nova Scotia, and runs a business called Skintastic 100 in nearby Chester. When she saw my statement from mid November calling everyone who called vaccines dangerous child neglectors and stating that they will be stopped, she barged in with this;

Co-Admin FT responded by telling her she wasn’t telling the truth and Carl Davis backed that up pointing out that the ingredients were no different in effect than apples and pears. And Coolen shot back this rubbish;

The entire body does that, idiot! Not just the digestive system!

At the same time elsewhere, Coolen reacted to Victoria toughening up the No Jab No Play laws thus;

FT was onto this as well wanting medical proof of her claim. Carl was also onto it, telling her she would have her kids taken off her. When I saw this, I gave her the official notification that she was being added to the AV Name Check on the next update. She reacted on this part this way;

Oh he will NOT! That is total rubbish! There is no immunity for life from the flu for a start!

You should be – once the legal action forthwith starts it’s work!

After I gave her the notification I went to her page and boy look at this nonsense!

Not to mention a thread asking how many of her friends were anti vaccine and got too many responses in the affirmative for me to put here! She also queried why if she voices an opinion respectfully she gets kicked to the curb. Well duhhhhhh! It’s because your opinion is bloody offensive to the vast majority of those on social media!

So I went to her Skintastic 100 page and gave her a 1 star review. That got me the following PM from her;

She also managed to remove my review, but I replaced it thus – and she can’t do anything about it now because she blocked me!

It has since been replaced by an even better one.

Meanwhile I asked for my friends to come in and give 1 star reviews and there was a good response. However one of them got the following PM’s from Coolen!

You’re the sick one, Coolen! But typical of an anti vaxxer. It would take too long to go through what’s happened since in screenshots but needless to say it’s been crazed, including one of her deluded friends who insisted I review the business and it’s products only and leave the owner alone. Well excuse us, idiot! Me and everyone else who gave it one star (I admit I did it twice with my personal account and my political account) know that the reality is that judgment can and should be made on everything about the business INCLUDING it’s owner! Especially when her attitude is a threat to the community as she is!

And that’s a bloody fact!

Del Bigtree the bully doesn’t get informed consent

It came to my attention Sunday night that Del Bigtree decided to harass James Horne – the ex husband of anti vaxxer Rebecca Bredow who was sent to prison for seven days for contempt of court. Bigtree challenged James at Los Angeles airport for being there and not in Detroit with his son, and tried to expose him as a neglectful father. James ignored all Bigtree’s questions, and quite rightly as well. It’s none of your bloody business, Bigtree! James could well have been in LA on business and his son may have been in the care of family. That’s not neglect! All Bigtree was doing was to try and make the mother look like an angel when she’d already fallen foul of the system by disobeying a court order to vaccinate her son! An order – no doubt – that Bigtree didn’t like. Well screw you! Come to Australia and harass me, Bigtree! You’ll get more than you bargain for and I don’t mean physically either! I’ll out gaff you – with the truth while I make you look like the bully and inciter of child neglect you are!

It also came to my attention through the crackpot Adventures in Autism blog that Bigtree had written a letter to the acting Secretary of Health and Human Services in America, Eric Hargan (filling in while a replacement is found for Tom Price), claiming that Health and Human Services wasn’t fulfilling the requirements of vaccine safety. In this 19 page letter several questions were put. In this blog entry I intend to respond to those questions as appropriately as I can.

(1) Please explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?

There’s no need for it. Testing over a long period of time has already been done and the differences in time are too small to be relevant. Provide proof that this testing is not adequate in full detail, and include in this verifiable proof of adverse reactions specifically to the Hepatitis vaccine. Anecdotes are not acceptable.

(2) Please list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life?

That is commercially confidential and none of your business.

(3) Please explain why HHS failed to cooperate with Harvard to automate VAERS reporting? And detail any steps that HHS has taken since toward automating VAERS reporting?

VAERS is broken because it is easily accessed by the general public and unverified information has been inserted. Automating the system will only exacerbate that issue.

(4) Please explain any specific steps taken by HHS to improve adverse reaction reporting to VAERS?

None. See the answer to question four for the explanation.

(5) For each of the 38 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 1994 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

There were none, because the subjects of the adverse events – and/or their parents – were not co-operative with the process.

(6) For each of the 135 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 2011 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

Again, there were none, because the subjects of the adverse events – and/or their parents – were not co-operative with the process.

(7) Please explain what HHS has done to assure that health care providers record the manufacturer and lot number for each vaccine they administer?

Nothing because that is additional bureaucratic mumbo jumbo that is not required.

(8) Please advise when HHS intends to begin conducting research to identify which children are susceptible to serious vaccine injury? If HHS believes it has commenced this research, please detail its activities regarding same?

We already know which children can not be vaccinated and it is up to the family physician to ensure this is taken into account.

(9) Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?

That claim should not be removed – because it’s true. There are 121 studies to prove it.

(10) Please advise whether HHS intends to forthwith conduct adequately powered and controlled prospective as well as retrospective studies comparing total health outcomes of fully/partially vaccinated children with completely unvaccinated children?

This is impossible so it will not be done. It is not as simple as you make it out to be.

(11) Please advise if you will:
a. prohibit conflict waivers for members of HHS’s vaccine committees (ACIP, VRBPAC, NVAC & ACCV)?
b. prohibit HHS vaccine committee members or HHS employees with duties involving vaccines from accepting any compensation from a vaccine maker for five years?
c. require that vaccine safety advocates comprise half of HHS’s vaccine committees?
d. allocate toward vaccine safety an amount at least equal to 50% of HHS’s budget for promoting/purchasing vaccines?
e. support the creation of a vaccine safety department independent of HHS?
f. support the repeal of the 1986 Act to the extent it grants immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their vaccine products?

a. There is no need for this.
b. The only way this can be done is to stop vaccine makers from payings taxes. That is not going to happen.
c. The sort of people that are being advocated will compromise the health of community through over protection from medicine leading to the return of preventable disease.
d. This will require higher taxes to pay for such a scheme.
e. There is no need for this either.
f. This defeats the purpose of the 1986 Act in that pharmaceutical companies contribute to the pool of money used for payouts. Such a limited repeal would be contradictory.

Having said that on the last one, I support the repeal of the whole thing lock stock and barrel. It’s a joke because it pays out of probability instead of the propoer rules of evidence in law. Or alternatively remove the protections of doctors and others who administer the vaccines – as I firmly believe that the vast majority of injuries are caused by system error (as was the case with Hannah Poling).

There’s your informed consent, Bigtree. Get it?

I know the answer. No, he doesn’t. We already have informed consent and he doesn’t want to know about it. He’s part of the Andrew Wakefield con job and it’s time it was stopped once and for all. With that in mind after I checked – guess what, Del?

Final expose of Mary Kristi Rowe

I noted today that Rowe has bailed on the comments areas on You Tube. Doesn’t matter – I already had all the screenshots, and I also have her details as well meaning that she’ll be in the top list of the AV Name Check on the next update. And yes there were more forcing this third entry. I thought as much. Mary Kristi Rowe is a coward. She won’t comment on here, preferring to make excuses and target someone else just because they linked her to here.

The instant someone invokes that history book and twists it, you know you’re dealing with a fool. One can’t reason with an unreasonable person, and Rowe is unreasonable. I know the form. It’s typical anti vax. So “speaking the truth in love” is impossible. You have to fight fire with fire. There is also so much wrong with this let’s break it down beyond her shifting the goal posts to another person instead of addressing me here.

1. The Momma she speaks of is Polly Tommey. She has no heart of gold. Her heart is jet black! Tommey has no compassion or concern – except for her deluded agenda to prove that vaccines cause Autism to the detriment of an entire community! Tommey is about as sincere as KKK devotee embracing Michelle Obama!

2. Regarding Rowe’s beliefs – they are deluded. Aside from the fact that there is no “God” (and if there was that non existent diety would be furious with you, Rowe!), you are bearing false witness to yourself. And you won’t even accept that you’re doing it! You aren’t vaccine injured. Neither is your daughter. You’re both Autistic and have been since birth. I can’t speak for anyone else of course, but that sort of denial earns no compassion. If you want compassion, disown your deluded and dangerous views. Until you do, you don’t deserve compassion.

3. Let’s talk about the dancing. Of course you were working the kids too hard. Because you had no empathy (typically Autistic) for them. You wanted them to be you. And here is the coincidence – the way you were working your Autistic body caught up with you at the same moment you got the MMR jab. THAT is why you had to stop. You didn’t adjust to your Autistic body and you paid for it. Had nothing whatsoever to do with the MMR. NOTHING! But you don’t want to be identified as Autistic do you? So you sink to this excuse to escape it. Not once did Rowe mention Autism to prove that.

4. What you don’t have the right to do is lie, especially about vaccines and about Autism. You DO have a problem with the coincidence accusation, otherwise you wouldn’t carry on like this. You DO want everyone to believe you. Thousands of lies don’t validate yours. They just show how poorly educated you and everyone else is. And that brings us to “getting all the info” argument. You have too much and you can’t separate the reliable from the unreliable. And you’re believing the unreliable because it fits your preferred version of events. The vaccination programs are fine when they are used as intended, and that includes pre screening which is another lie on your part. That IS done – or it should be. Only quacks don’t. The safety level already exists.

As was pointed out to her, claiming a vaccine injury is the same as saying vaccines don’t work. Lying about the vaccine injury only has one effect – undermining vaccine efficacy. You might have believed they worked, Rowe, but you don’t now! Otherwise you would continue to vaccinate! Ergo – you DON’T believe they work! You have plenty of motivation for lying. It’s called denial of reality. You don’t want to know like all anti vaxxers. You have your own little world. You want your message out there when it’s a lie so you can gain respect. The same sort of respect Hitler engaged in before he wiped out the Jews. You want to wipe out Autism, because that’s what your claims to vaccine injury will lead to if you aren’t gagged! You want freedom of speech? Hate speech doesn’t count!! And you DID read this blog! Stat Counter showed you did! You want to talk? Comment here! I don’t have an account on You Tube.

That first sentence is a contradiction, unless she is talking about a sore arm – which we know she isn’t. There are no PROVEN adverse events like what she has claimed. Only anecdotes, which are valueless in medicine unless they have back up! All those other examples do not match those of vaccines. Nowhere near it. The benefit v risk ratio for vaccines are way over towards the benefits. The risk is 1 in a million, and that is only because of human error through using the vaccine incorrectly. Take the human factor out, and vaccines are 100 percent safe.

I saw no logic, reason or honesty. So civility is useless. It’s you who needs to do some soul searching and it starts with acknowledging that you are not vaccine injured. You are Autistic. Your standard is low.

And I’ll say it again. I’m not on You Tube. Want to talk to me? COMMENT HERE!!

More rubbish from Mary Kristi Rowe

I collected some of these screenshots myself this morning upon noticing that there was more than I’d been sent (and one was clipped by accident), and this woman is a liar! The person she was arguing with was owning her rear end.

This lot started with this from Rowe;

You’re not vaccine injured. You haven’t proven it. I remain convinced that you found out you were Autistic, and blamed it on the vaccine when you were Autistic from birth. Like it or not. Take note here that she admits to being anti vaccine, and see what happens below.

First off, the comparison to cigarette smoking is ridiculous – because unlike vaccination, smoking is risky to the max!

Second, there was PLENTY to base the comment that she is a liar on! There is no lab work. If there was there would be medical back up and a court case claiming the damage. Remember that her doctor wouldn’t take her claims seriously, because he knew she was wrong! When liars like this run their mouths they have to expect to be insulted, especially when it comes to one of the most important medical practices in the history of man – vaccination.

This rant has so many lies in it it’s unreal – starting with what is obviously a belief in that idiot Robert F Kennedy Junior’s stupid line that mercury is mercury and that ethyl mercury doesn’t exist in effect (or methyl mercury come to that). Along with weight adjusted nonsense that I’ve already hung Twistan Wells for. It doesn’t work like that and besides the amount of ethyl mercury per vaccine was 12.5 micrograms. 12 and a half parts to a million! The claim that her daughter had mercury in her body to such high levels means the reading was taken from the unreliable hair test – or she lied again. Another lie – doctors ARE educated on vaccines. Her claim that her nephew is a doctor is therefore also a lie, or he is a specialist in a field that doesn’t deal with vaccines (general example – an osteopath, a doctor in America but nowhere else including Australia! Sherri Tenpenny is one of those.). It’s obvious that Rowe is reading unreliable sources. Not one piece of legit research. That’s why you won’t get through. There is no conflict of interest between the pharmaceutical companies and the medical community, because vaccines make no profit. All the profits come from pain killers and the medical community is actually striking back trying to get said pain killers better controlled. At least that’s what’s happening in Australia! That lunch claim is total bunk! Known side effects? A sore arm? Whoopee do.

Now I do agree that babies shouldn’t be vaccinated when they are ill and running a temperature. But that’s on the instructions and some you actually can. A doctor who ignores those instructions is a quack who should be reported. The doctor is guilty of vaccine injury, not the vaccine. That’s why I hate the Vaccine Court. Doctors who do that get off scot free when they shouldn’t. They wouldn’t in Australia – except that idiotic parents blame the vaccine! That’s a key reason why an investigation is essential!

That was when I was brought in and she was told about “the list” – meaning of course the AV Name Check.

More lies about doctors lunches. Except the point about the government paying – and that’s needed certainly in the US because they have to be in attendance. If you don’t provide perks they’ll go where the money is and those who don’t have money will die – per the Tea Party saying “Let them die”. That was disgusting then and it is now, and it’s NOT a spot to cut health spending! Doing that will make the US health system an even bigger joke than it is now! Her claim that she has been careful is nonsense. She has found sites that she wants to believe instead of ones that are actually peer reviewed and correct. That one site she noted is 100 percent unreliable! If you want assistance, Rowe, it starts with stopping blaming the vaccines for your and your daughter’s issues! As long as you do, you won’t get help. You won’t be believed because it has been confirmed that vaccines are safe when used correctly.

My previous entry was then linked and look at this whine!

First of all, I love Stat Counter. Because it confirmed I was right. Rowe does live in Gadsden, Alabama (nearby Eastaboga showed up). Nothing here is false or malicious. Come at me with that accusation in court! I have won three court cases already and I can throw you right out of whack because I can prove with evidence that you are lying. You have no proof of your claims. Now note here that she says she is NOT an anti vaxxer and yet earlier as noted further up she said that she IS!! As she was rightly told, ex vaxxer and anti vaxxer are the same thing. She now wants us to believe that because she vaccinated means she can’t be an anti vaxxer. Yes you can! Your lies about vaccines on the public domain is anti vax behaviour and that’s a public interest matter by the way. Also, it’s clear that she doesn’t understand herd immunity. Her railing against vaccines fits the bill of inciting child neglect per the AV Name Check.

More excuses to not come here and comment. Get some guts, Rowe. If you have a problem with what I wrote – comment here! Don’t sulk away on that You Tube video comments area. That makes you a coward, and actually that makes sense. All anti vaxxers are cowards. I have twisted nothing here. I’ve called you out for what you are – an anti vaxxer and a inciter of child neglect. So…..

Mary Kristi Rowe is deluded

It was brought to my attention on the comments of a You Tube video by my good friend and fellow Autistic Fiona O’Leary that we have another candidate for the AV Name Check. I had a look and it looks like this one is a candidate.

A quick skim of a web search revealed that it looks like she lives in Gadsden, Alabama in the US. She must be in the anti vaccine loop because she knew about John Piesse here in Victoria so it makes sense that she’s a typical American anti vaxxer loaded with conspiracy theories and also making claims without medical proof. That goes back to my “Once and for all – Prove it” entry again. Here’s the link again.


Let’s review some of these comments.

First off Tommey isn’t a doctor, and she is a liar and manipulator. It’s not without foundation that she was kicked out of Australia. She doesn’t have a vaccine injured son. She has an Autistic son. Two totally different things. What you witnessed was taken into account by the doctor and ignored because you were wrong. Everyone asked were telling the same story because they refused to believe the truth out of paranoia and stupidity. And it’s interesting that Rowe admits that Vaxxed is about the MMR vaccine when the promotional material disowns any connection to vaccines. That one she told the truth about and it proves that it IS an anti vaccine film! Owned! What scares us is the lies being told being believed leading to less vaccinations and more preventable disease and more childhood deaths!

Tommey should be in jail. She is lying witch. The Court of Federal Claims (the Vaccine Court) is a joke because it doesn’t follow the rules of evidence that a court should, so it pays out too easily. If it did the payouts would be a whole lot less, if not zero! 50 percent and a feather is not a high standard of proof! The fee does exist and that was part of the agreement met in 1986, and frankly it should be taken down not because it protects Big Pharma but because it protects negligent doctors and nurses who make the mistakes with vaccines that do injure. Vaccines themselves have NEVER injured anyone. Any injury is caused by the system. The inserts – and this was mentioned in reply on the comments – are legal statements and have no medical value. VAERS is an unreliable repository that is loaded with false claims because anyone can report an incident and not need to medically prove it. The only people playing Russian Roulette are those who won’t vaccinate. The Supreme Court never made any ruling on vaccines themselves and this was expanded on;

Researched where? Google? Get out of here, Rowe! Google Uni is closed to people like you because you only read what you want to read! She put the noose around Justice Scalia in particular, but Scalia NEVER said the words “unavoidably unsafe”.

Oh what a liar! Again – the words “unavoidably unsafe” were never used in any opinion, not just Scalia’s! Rowe never read it, or rather she never understood it. Now while the claim itself was about involving vaccine design and that wasn’t covered by the Vaccine Court so pharma could be sued for it, it was also ruled that all vaccine related matters go to the vaccine court. So that in fact allows for the Vaccine Court to make recommendations, leading to better design. But given the poor standard for proof in the Vaccine Court Big Pharma doesn’t have to listen. There was NO discussion on the term “unavoidably unsafe”. The risk of injury lies in usage and not the vaccine itself. When the system is working properly, vaccination is safe. Any side effects are minor. Risks were never considered by the US Supreme Court.

Rowe called out on the first paragraph and I’ll repeat it. A design-defect claim does not mean unavoidably unsafe. I’ll clarify that by saying that the claim needs to be proven first, and also that unavoidably unsafe does not correlate with that as a defect can be corrected. Therefore the lack of safety (supposed) is removed and is therefore not unavoidable!

The second paragraph suggests that Rowe is making the same claim as Tommey (and Ginger Taylor). That vaccine injury equals Autism. The main suggestion is that it “runs in the family”. Autism would run in a family – it’s genetic. Getting the chicken pox does NOT confer lifelong immunity (my sister in law got it twice!) and any childhood disease has the potential to kill! I repeat the reference re the measles that I have made before – Olivia Dahl. I got the measles and it was far from pleasant. My sister did too. She got the Chicken Pox and the Mumps (I avoided both somehow). I remember the Mumps being really nasty. If those conditions didn’t scare you then you are an idiot! Confirm the Autism is your family so I know what I’m dealing with.

This is another reference to Google. You don’t know more because what you “know” is wrong. You haven’t proven you are a member of the “vaccine injury club”.

We all know a liar when we see one, Rowe, and you are a liar. You don’t know yourself or your daughter and that’s dangerous to both of you. I’m a paralegal – which is as close as one can get to being a lawyer without doing the study and getting the qualifications – and I can tell you that you didn’t understand what you read in that Supreme Court decision. Your medical experience (based on your own words) is faked because you wouldn’t listen to your doctor in the first place as stated further up. The minute you do that, your experience means nothing.

These screenshots were sent to me and I am told there was one more that was deleted, but the content was retained in an automatic email. I won’t reproduce it, but Rowe claimed to have a “Jurist Doctorate”. I looked it up and it’s actually a Juris Doctorate, and in the United States this does not require scholarly content. It is required in Australia and other western countries (how dumb is the US huh?). Either way, Rowe has never been before a judge presenting a case. I have.

This is going to take two entries so I’ll leave this here and finish it tomorrow, including maybe an update as I expect this entry to be linked to Rowe. If she wants to react to it – do that here and not on You Tube as I do not have an account there. Using others as informants for this is not appropriate in this case.

Roslyn Ross – uncaring callous bitch

Many anti vaxxers are this way because they claim to have vaccine injured children (none of those claims have been proven as I have said many times).

But others have jumped on board to bolster numbers for their own methods. Those from the natural solutions area; naturopaths and homeopaths. Roslyn Ross is one of these people.

I have come across her before – she was on the AV Name Check I think from the beginning which means she may have shown up on the Tribeca Change dot org petition way back when. But I’m not sure. Anyway, I recently ran into her on that garbage fake news site the Australian National Review on their story defending anti vax quack John Piesse who was providing the means to avoid both No Jab No Pay and No Jab No Play (he’s in Victoria so he avoided the preferred and original version of the latter) and maintain the idiots who were refusing to vaccinate their kids for no good medical reason. Such quacks in Australia will be found and struck off as Andrew Wakefield was in the UK. As they should be.

But Ross was in the comments peddling total nonsense that she wasn’t reading properly from what I’m told and in some cases using blatantly obvious quack sites such as Global Freedom Movement (which even she admitted was radical). I was onto her as were the other two active admins on the AAAV Facebook page (FT and LB) as well as Carl Davis and Chrissie McKewen, with Barb Vernon also getting her two cents in. I miss Melanie Jewell (she’s having family issues at the moment as is the third admin of AAAV JD) because as a scientist she would have had Ross for breakfast, lunch and dinner!

But just today, I discovered that she’d deleted her Facebook account (presumably) and started a new one! To cover her tracks and stimy any further investigations! Now my plan was to tear apart her comments but this news caused me to look elsewhere for fodder – and I didn’t have to look much further through a Dogpile search.


Before I go to the content, I’ll just reference her alma mater – Vermont Girls High School. I looked it up and found that it was a former school in Plympton in Adelaide. I know it well. I’ve umpired the junior football club and seen the senior football club play as recently as July this year. But I digress.

This entry tore Ross apart. She’s into homeopathy, and is a skeptic of what she calls “Allopathic medicine” AKA mainstream medicine. She claimed in the comments on the Piesse article that she’d spent time in India, where there is a lot of reliance on homeopathy and the like. That plus sanitation issues is why there have been reported issues with the polio vaccine. I’ve always said that vaccines are the final preventative, but not the whole preventative. Sanitation without a doubt brought mortality rates down. But it didn’t reduce the incidence and that’s the equation that vaccines complete. Vaccines without sanitation could present some issues.

This was in 2015 and Ross appeared in the comments and called herself not anonymous because she has integrity. WTAF?? Integrity? I have more of that in my pinkie than she has in her whole body! She is deluded, which is why she believes so much in what she does. She’s up there with the likes of Frankie Vasquez, Angela Offer/Eisenhauer, Rixta Francis and the like. Totally out of touch with the real world.

And as if to prove this, she was all over the comments on this entry;


It would take way too long to go through everything, but one thing stood out here as much as it did on the Piesse article. This woman doesn’t care. She see vaccines as useless without understanding a thing about it. This is why she is on the AV Name Check – this is incitement to child neglect, and that makes her what I called her in the title; an uncaring bitch. Her new Facebook account is being watched, and my investigations are ongoing. Like those in the top section of the Check, she will get hers – and it will be nice and legal.

Like it will be with everyone else. Not a criminal act in sight. Nor is there any criminal intent. Fact.

Frankie Vasquez has sawdust for brains

I have noticed that one of the craziest anti vaxxers in Australia is now trying to claim that the Commonwealth of Australia is owned by Dun and Bradstreet! Take a look!

Now I reproduced the link near the top, and this is what it REALLY shows!

And to back it up;

He made that up! Each and every address given is owned by the real Commonwealth of Australia. Dun and Bradstreet has been around longer than the Commonwealth (it was founded in 1841) but all it is according to Wikipedia – yeah not the best source but anyway – is a business services company. It will have data on all commercial entities. That’s it’s job. It doesn’t own any of it! The ABN that is in the search is the ABN of the Australian Tax Office.

Each of the notes in Frankie’s screenshot is proof of the Commonwealth of Australia doing business in the United States. It has to do this as a private company in the eyes of the IRS. That’s what D&B is noting. Whether it be the Embassy itself in Washington DC, the various consulates, the trade commission and so on. But of course Fwankie can’t see that because he has sawdust for brains.

This was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Today, I tried to report Frankie to SA Health’s Mental Health triage. Unfortunately they need police intervention first, but they did appreciate the effort. Section 56 was mentioned and I looked it up – it’s Section 56 of the Mental Health Act 2009. That however doesn’t refer to the police. But Section 57 is a near replica of Section 56 and that’s the one where the police do have jurisdiction. But after a call to Salisbury police station (the Elizabeth cop shop’s phone rang out) it was confirmed that they can’t act until they catch him in real life, and I think he knows it hence his hiding from the police on the two occasions he has been visited by the police in the past month. But I for one will be keeping the pressure on. This effort is specific to Fwankie and isn’t a part of any of the other efforts against others listed on the AV Name Check, because he is a special case. Heavy emphasis on the word “special”.

Believe me, if I have my way in the end – there is a padded cell waiting for him at Yatala Prison. He is a bona fide nutcase, fruitcake standard.